Never. Wait I didn't vote for Bush. At least my conscience is clean on that part.
2007-06-15 01:31:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by White Star 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
on the Bush tax cut back , McCain voted against it. He voted for the surge whilst Bush needed to stay status quo in Iraq. McCain did help Roberts and Alito yet so did each and every Republican yet Chaffe and different Senators like Byrd, Rockefeller and Nelson who're Democrats who voted for the two. attempting to tie McCain to Bush is a fallacy that all of us is attempting to hold approximately. Over 70% of the expenses exceeded interior the Senate are via unanimous consent. on the flaws that fairly remember. McCain supported Bush approximately 50% of the time quite than the ninety 5% the Obama marketing campaign lies approximately.
2016-10-17 08:35:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by wallin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll admit that I didn't vote for Gore or Kerry. How's that?
I've often said in a country with 300 million people, it's difficult for me to believe that Al Gore, John Kerry and George Bush were the three best choices we could find for the last two elections.
But, hey, there's an election just around the corner. Perhaps you'll throw your name into the ring. Yeah, I threw my name in but I'm just not getting any response from the media at all! Appears I don't have a chance but - 300 million people...
2007-06-15 01:38:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by OneManWrites 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I did twice.
How exactly would my grand kids pay and how can you predict things that will be happening in 40 years will be bush's fault? in no way shape or form could it be some other reason besides Bush?
What if everything turns out great? will you eat crow and admit you were wrong? or would you decided it was some on else's doing? ( a democrat perhaps?)
Unless you have an affinity for Predicting the Future, I doubt you know with any degree of certainty that 1) the world will be in trouble and 2) it would be entirely Bush's Fault.
By the Way I am not Saying Bush is perfect, he is not, But I am saying you are using your personal bias and hatred rather than rational thought.
2007-06-15 01:47:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stone K 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yes, I would admit I voted for President Bush. It isnt his fault that the french have a 25% unemployment rate for people 19-26, that Hamas and Fatah are engaging in civil unrest and execute each other in the streets, that Iraqi insurgents continue to blow up thier own people, or that people are unwilling to take responsibility for themselves. In the United States and around the world, people are unwilling to look to themselves for an answer to thier problems. Many are so focused on blaming everyone else, and faulting other people for thier problems that there isn't any sort of community left in the world. We want the solutions to be easy, like "impeaching" the president, but they are not that simple. There would still be terrorism, civil war and genocide in the rest of the world no matter who was in the white house... Blaming/Hating president bush for the state of the world today is completely stupid because there are BILLIONS of other people in the world causing problems.
2007-06-15 01:53:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kailey 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Admit it, I am proud to have voted for Bush, look at the
choices, in 2000 Al Gore, he still can't count, pays
$30,000 per month utility bill for his home, flies around
in Gulf Streams to lecture on Global Warming to tell
everyone how bad these things are.
2004 John Kerry, he was a traitor, testifying in the Senate
about war crimes that even he admitted to committing, of
course he was granted immunity, while we still had POW's
being held in Vietnam. John Kerry didn't even get all of
the Electoral votes in the states the democrats won,
one vote went to John Edwards.
So yes, I will admit I voted for Bush.
Will you admit that almost all of the Democrats voted
to goto war? and voted to fund the war, before they
decided to not fund the war, promised the American
people that if elected to Congress they would stop the
war, promised to not back down to Bush's veto of
the funding bill and then did back down?
2007-06-15 01:35:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by justgetitright 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
If I had, I would. I didn't. He never impressed me from the beginning. Not that I feel as if I saw what the pro votes didn't, I don't think anyone had any idea what we were in for with this guy.
2007-06-15 03:58:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ms.L.A. 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I did and would again seeing the current list of individuals running.
If you didn't limit your news coverage to the mainstream media. You might be able to see through the cloud of liberalism that we are not that bad off.
Jobs - ok
Economy - ok
Home security - ok
Other than all the negative coverage mainly of the war... Whats wrong ? Tell people a lie long enough and they will start to believe in it.
2007-06-15 01:40:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Robert S 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I´m in europe, and i proundly admit i voted for Bush. the 2nd time that is... not the first time...
you remember this one, where John Kerry gave up when there were still votes to be counted... says something about his character no?
it amazes me that people are anti-bush, and anti-war... they forget that this war came to us.... do you remember 9-11 or not? terrorism is as real today as it was then.....
our grandkids will benefit from what Bush has done.
2007-06-15 01:32:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by James R 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Of course I'm willing to 'admit' voting for him. Goodness, he won that second election by a landslide.
Is there are meaning here, or just another slam?
2007-06-15 01:32:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋