Do we need a smart, balanced, inciteful man in the White House?

Question

I say the heck with ideology, it has created a stranglehold on the Republican party, were, lesser men have taken center stage to the regret of all of us.

Answer 1

Of course. And you propose who?

Answer 2

None of what you say is true. Who, first of all,determines who is smart, balanced and insightful? President Bush does not follow any ideology. He is not conservative, like most Republicans used to be. He does what he thinks is right for the US. Most of the time, I disagree with him. I wish conservative philosophy would dominate in the Republican party. Republicans get elected then act like Democrats. You should have used spell checker.

Answer 3

I want a president who will represent the will of the American people, not an ideological boondoggle constructed in an ultraconservative think tank.

Answer 4

God, that is so obvious. We are nearly 8 years too late, but hope springs eternal. Honestly, there cannot be a worse man ever holding high office... look out later for my question on Foreign policy.

Answer 5

Yes, unless you'd prefer a dumb, unbalanced and clueless man in the White House. Never mind, we have that already.

Answer 6

Yes. A problem solver, not a paid for & bought corporate shill.

Answer 7

Yes, we do need a man who cares about us. Obama does. Check this: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/273564/16_years_of_a_shredded_society_what.html

Answer 8

We shouldn't have him (or her) inciting anything, unless it's something positive.

Answer 9

Why does it have to be a MAN? Your question is flawed in that it's gender biased. (For the record, this does not mean I'm supporting Hillary)

Answer 10

Yes. we do