English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

spiderman 3 has got way more action than spiderman 2.....i agree it was venom who ruined the movie but still sandman had made it good.....sandman's powers r really good compared to that of dr otto's powers....let me give u an example....if u see sandman and dr otto fight it would be sandman who will win.that is because sandman can grow to a big height which dr otto cannot...and when dr otto tries to use his arms it would go through sandman's body....and the action in spidey 1 were in bits and pieces to that of the second..so spidey 2 is better than the first..as the third one had most of the action it is the best

2007-06-15 00:38:11 · 10 answers · asked by LFC REDS 3 in Entertainment & Music Comics & Animation

10 answers

Spider Man 3 was by far the best movie in the entire series.It had an even mixture of action romance, and comedy. Sure Venom wasn't as good as I expected but other than that there was no major flaws. Even my brother who normally hates superhero movies liked it.

2007-06-15 04:17:56 · answer #1 · answered by DefIronAeroCrueRush 2 · 0 0

I disagree... Just based on action? Spider-man 2 had amazing action sequences especially the fight on the train. Spider-man 3 had only one exciting action sequence when Harry attack Peter. The other action scenes, while amazing graphics, were pretty tame.

The movie was also done poorly as far as the story went. Mixed way too much in. You have Harry bouncing all over the place. Sandman popping in at practically the most random times. And the symbiote and Venom sprinkled in for fan satisfaction. And the Sandman would have been amazing if not for the lack of space. In the first 2 movies, the villains realize their wrongs (Norman with Harry, Otto with his experiment) but Sandman just sort of slinks away and then pops back up with a "Oops sorry" moment. Venom, I understand not having regrets.

The movie was worth it to watch for the fact that it's Spider-man 3 and (apparently) the only time we'll see Venom in live-action, but it doesn't hold up against the great story and action in Spider-man 2.

2007-06-15 13:48:50 · answer #2 · answered by soulm0nk3y 3 · 0 0

Sorry, pal. I liked Spidey 2 better than I did 3. I loved what they did with Sandman (my favorite Spidey villain) and Venom (my least favorite). And I thought that it was cool the way they adapted the church-bell scene where Peter is tearing the suit off of him. Straight out of the comics. Action-wise, the movie was great.

But I liked the message that 2 was trying to convey a lot better than this one. Spidey 2 had more heart than 3 did. I cared about Peter and MJ more in 2 than I did in 3.

My wife too, who knows next to nothing about comics other than what I have told her felt the same way. She loved the first two films and felt sorta 'ehhh' about 3.

This is just my opinion. You are certainly entitled to your own. I just feel I need more than just some dazzling action and SFX to make it a good movie for me. I need to care about the characters I am investing my time and money into. And 2 pulled that off better for me than 3 did.

2007-06-15 00:57:47 · answer #3 · answered by Randy M 3 · 0 0

I think spiderman 3 was better than the first 2. I think it was the sandman who ruined the movie not venom. i mean he solved nothing i bet his kid died lol. Anyway i think the 3rd was the best because of Venom and the black spiderman suit. Peter was a little emo but the dancing he did was cute. Although i think peter should have ended up with Gwen stacy.

2007-06-15 02:13:05 · answer #4 · answered by nobody 5 · 0 0

Spiderman 3 sucked beyond belief. What was up with the dance number? Like Pirates 3, the movie just had too much; too many character, too many plots. Spiderman 1, was the best and still is.

2007-06-15 00:48:56 · answer #5 · answered by King Kona 2 · 0 0

Nah spiderman 2 was shocking, spidery 3 has gotta be better just because its got 4villains including venom, Doc Ock in numnber 2 sucked

2007-06-15 00:46:43 · answer #6 · answered by Dana O 2 · 0 0

um.. extra action yet little doubt Spider guy 2 is extra appropriate than 3, additionally 3 lacked a real intense plot, i advise Sandman had no reason to kill Petey boy and it in simple terms appeared to dancy and siging for me yet i nevertheless did like it plenty, Spider guy 2 is seen the main suitable superhero movie ever made

2016-11-24 21:08:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I liked 3 bettter and I hope they make a 4 with Kraven, Carnage, and Scorpion.

2007-06-15 01:36:00 · answer #8 · answered by B. L 1 · 0 0

if we are talking about Values here, Spiderman 3 has more of it.... We shouldn't judge the movie just by its skin, we have to swim its whole depth and storyline.... therefore, i agree that its the best spiderman movie ever.. thanks for making me realize it guys....

2007-06-15 01:56:09 · answer #9 · answered by Three more 2 · 0 0

its a good movie

2007-06-15 00:46:58 · answer #10 · answered by ninjette2stale 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers