English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

this question goes out medical professionals.

2007-06-14 21:46:43 · 7 answers · asked by marchgal 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

considering ethics and the patient's best interest if he or she has not obtained an Advanced Medical Directive Act

2007-06-14 22:07:01 · update #1

7 answers

I don't understand the question. The MD writes a DNR order usually on someone who is terminal. It only applies in the hospital, not anywhere else except perhaps a nursing home, but the physician there has to write the order! Usually it is the primary physician.

It only has to be written. They still have to make some effort before an arrest has occurred, but do not once in arrest!

2007-06-14 21:55:13 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 1

If the person has not set forth an Advanced Directive prior to hospitalization then the responsibility for making the decision will fall on the legal next of kin.
The family is then expected to make the best decision based on what they think the patient would have wanted.
The legality - it must be in writing and signed by the physician on the patient's chart.
Ethically - the person must have the best interest of the patient in mind, and being making decisions based on sound medical advice.

2007-06-14 23:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by Susie D 6 · 0 0

you should also search for suggestion out of your state guidelines/regulations.. i'm no longer confident what state you stay in, yet some states, such as Illinois, require the DNR to be on a particular kind. (In Illinois it is a salmon colored kind). As a firefighter/paramedic for 8 years, I dealt with this a lot.. Now that i'm operating contained in the wellbeing-regulation field i'm seeing this example for a thoroughly different perspective. the major the following is be prepared, get the sorts nicely in improve, make confident they are signed by the perfect activities, and then make human beings conscious that this parson has a DNR.. that's a lot extra ordinary to offer up or by no ability commence providing care, than that's to remove a feeding or respiratory tube from someone.. best of success..

2016-11-24 20:56:22 · answer #3 · answered by cisco 4 · 0 0

It's not so much a medical question as it is a legal question.

If you have no Advanced Directive, the patient has communicated nothing to you, and they have no Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare, then the next of kin is your next and perhaps final option.

Ethically, see what the American Medical Association says. You can't simply not make every attempt to save a person no matter how hopeless their case may appear. A family member may then sue for malpractice.

2007-06-14 22:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Before you can obtain a relevant legal answer you need to indicate in what state you are living. Each state has particular requirements for a DNR, including the signatories and the construction of such.

2007-06-15 01:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by hexeliebe 6 · 0 0

go to your local hospital and ask to speak to a caseworker they will then give you a living will to sign and on it it has the D.N.R the hospital is the fastest and easiest way to get this done and it is free of charge most times and if you are on a fixed income they will waive the prossing fee

2007-06-14 21:58:42 · answer #6 · answered by kambueno01 3 · 0 0

IT MEANS EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS:THE "ORDER" INSTRUCTS MEDICAL PERSONNEL AS TO THE WISHES OF THAT PATIENT-- "DO NOT RESUSCITATE"---DO NOT USE RESUSCITATION MACHINES, OR METHODS TO "REVIVE A PERSON WHO HAS STOPPED BREATHING, OR, HEART HAS STOPPED BEATTING!!!-DIFFERENT STATES HAVE DIFFERENT LAWS---CONSULT EITHER A LAWYER, OR A SOCIAL WORKER ( FOR FREE AT MOST HOSPITALS) IN YOUR STATE FOR THE "SKINNY" ON YOUR PARTICULSR STATES LAW RULING(S) CONCERNING THIS TOPIC!!!

2007-06-18 15:43:59 · answer #7 · answered by LONG-JOHN 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers