It depends on what you want from your wrestling show. If you want more stupid storylines, idiotic commentators whose voices grate on your nerves, & having to see the same moron in the main event every freaking week, then you won't like TNA. However, for those of us who actually watch wrestling because we want to see more wrestling & less storylines, prefer commentators who sound more professional & less retarded, & who prefer some variety in our main events over the weekly "Joke Cena overcoming impossible odds" fest, TNA rocks. For me, I would just as soon see them drop the skits altogether, & stick Kevin Nash in the ring where he belongs if he's not too injured to wrestle.
So, if you prefer having over half the show wasted with stupid interviews & behind-the-scenes acting instead of wrestling, don't watch TNA, because as the name says, it's Total Nonstop Action. If you prefer idiotic cartoon character commentary from morons like Jerry Lawler & Jim Ross, don't watch TNA, because they have a real professional commentator in "The Professor" Mike Tenay. Oh, & if want to know before you turn on the TV that you'll finish your night with the same no-talent hack like John Cena putting on the same stupid match with only slight variation in the opponents, don't watch TNA, because you never know who will be in their main event.
2007-06-14 19:45:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the full corporation has been uninteresting for over a twelve months, even with the undeniable fact that it doesnt remember, human beings will proceed to computer screen. they have the fancier broadcast, the money and the reality that they have got been around so long that the WWF is a greater robust half and young infants observe (even with the call replace). they'll final from each and all of the money made in the 80's and ninety's. the two WCW and ECW have been certainly greater effective shows yet they only couldnt sustain with the an prolonged time of earnings. you should bear in mind how lots Vince doesnt care appropriate to the followers. NBC is paying him out the as s to sell Trump and the apprentice, this is worth it to him to piss off some unswerving followers. bear in mind it grew to become into worth it to have a paper champ for many of 2005/2006 that grew to become into booed with the aid of three/4ths of the followers with the aid of fact he offered greater merchandise and ought to do video clips and categorized classified ads. He chooses to positioned on undesirable television, with the aid of fact no one will upward thrust up and say "this sucks, Im executed with you"
2016-12-13 03:23:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by messenger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It owns both RAW and ECW. At least TNA doesn't need to kill off its owner to make people give a f*** about it.
2007-06-15 02:09:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Keyring 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
TNA is boring... because the entrance of the wrestlers have no "flare"... their acting job are bad...real bad!(we all know it's just acting ^_^)... and basically because some WWE wrestlers always find themselves in TNA when they are totally out of the spotlight... i mean TNA have become the thrashcan of WWE...
2007-06-14 18:54:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by KingOfKings 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
BORING? smackdown is boring the only way i can watch that is to tivo it and fastforward through it!
2007-06-14 18:56:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yahoo vince mc man is gone if not dead. no more kiss his *** club, the reason tna is boring is because no copertion from wwe. for a while.
2007-06-14 18:47:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by i,m here if you need to talk. 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not as boring as Raw/ECW/Smackdown
2007-06-14 19:09:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
as there no one a good and a strong wrestler like that are in wwe.
2007-06-14 20:09:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Harshit s 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
YOU KIDDIN ME T I T 'S AND A S S aint boring well unless you are gay heheheh hahaha damm im funny i crack myself up ..... self patt on back
2007-06-14 18:46:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
is fake here is the proof is a quick 10 second video http://youtube.com/watch?v=pA4D9-r7JWg
2007-06-14 18:44:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋