If that's what it came down to, who would you go with?
2007-06-14 17:24:52 · 14 answers · asked by jezzie1977 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Rudy: he was heroic during 911. His calm steel edge demeanor unwavered during a time when all chaos and bedlam tore open and loose from Hell, assaulting NYC as the Twin Towers were hit and brought down .
Rudy's wise leadership made it possible for NYC / New Jersey police, fire and para-medical on site personnel to handle the disaster far better than expected.
Hillary was at home when 911 broke out....she watched it unfold on TV.
My vote is for Rudy.
2007-06-14 17:46:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm a Republican and not a fan of Bill, but I would be tempted to vote for Hillary.
Conservatives said that morals were important during Clinton's terms, and I think that it would be hard to vote for someone whose history on morals was questioned as much as Rudy's.
Hillary has been around so long that all the dirt on her is probably known. I'm afraid we haven't seen all the dirt on Rudy yet.
2007-06-18 20:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by Phil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abstain. They are both the same wolf in dog's clothing that the media tries to pass off as sheep.
Neither one of them care about the people of this country.
http://www.ontheissues.org
http://www.votesmart.org
"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president." - Hillary
"We don't all agree on everything. I don't agree with myself on everything."
“Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do." - Rudy
2007-06-15 00:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by tj 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't like either they both change there mind daily on just about every subject. I'm a republican but Rudy's not for me but i would take him over Hillary that woman lies more than anyone Ive ever seen.....
2007-06-15 00:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence to decide on critical issues and she has experience to have stability under pressure.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-06-15 06:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would abstain from voting for the presidents of choice. I can't in good conscience vote for a pro-choice candidate.
But, it won't happen because Fred Thompson will take the Republican party candidates by storm as soon as he announces his candidacy in July.
2007-06-15 01:01:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
RON PAUL! They are both Neo-cons just under a different party name. The problem with our country is that unless you have millions of dollars you can't run for president even though anyone is supposed to be able to. If you don't get the backing of a party you can't be president because you spend so much time trying to get on ballots you can't even campaign. Unless you have millions to spend or you are backed by one of those parties you won't even be on a lot of the ballots... OUR COUNTRY IS BEING CONTROLLED BY NEO-CONS and thats just one of many examples. VOTE RON PAUL AND SAVE OUR COUNTRY!
2007-06-15 01:20:58 · answer #7 · answered by Eric _ 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
NEITHER candidate is anywhere NEAR liberal, They are both the same. They want an american empire. Don't even give party lines a single thought, they are illusions, it is fascism.
2007-06-15 01:30:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Rudy for sure. she is the worst candidate out there i think. she is way too liberal for me.
2007-06-15 00:32:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Rudy...
2007-06-15 01:16:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋