they have found some ways to stop IEDs, but liberals in the bureaucracy are stopping them from being used
for example, the army want to booby trap some of the materials they need to make it so it will go off on the pussy terrorist low life, not our soldiers, but they won't let them do it
2007-06-14 16:21:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by don't hate snowflake 3
·
8⤊
4⤋
First, you can't stop an IED. There are enough explosives in the world that no amount of "research" will ever prevent it. The only way to prevent an IED is to kill the sorry person building them.
As to why we spend 100 million on a plane. Its so that you can ask questions like this without fear of getting blown up by an IED.
2007-06-14 16:41:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by larryrickman2000 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
the assumption of an ASBO became continually a sop to the hundreds. to grant Yobs Anti-Social Behaviour Orders and then fail to enforce them through loss of perfect dedication invites the Yob to handle them as marks of advantage interior of their social order. there is an common loss of information in the hallowed partitions of the Planet Westminster on the way consumer-friendly human beings tick. while a Yob is so pleased with the term (Yob potential backward boy) that they positioned on it on their tee shirts, this is barely the subsequent step to delight in the notoriety of amassing ASBO's. we choose a manner of bringing shame to those louts, per possibility amassing canine mess from pavements at the same time as wearing yellow coats with entire loser imprinted on the uniform might help (appropriate supervised of direction). Heaven forbid that i might disappointed the sensibilities of the Loony Left and Do good Brigade to characterize Public Birching. in spite of the undeniable fact that, the baring of the decrease aspects of the physique in front of a baying crowd and taking various lashes from the Birch might help to pay interest the Yobs innovations interior the right direction. specific there'll be TodASBO's (toddlers ASBO's) quickly truly. The very concept that oldsters who're incapable; are citing toddlers of their very own ilk and since the generations pass on, those young toddlers gets worse; this is horrifying. 3 12 months olds wearing knives to nursery college could be the norm. Civilisations die no longer with a bang, yet a whimper. at the same time as a succession of inept, incapable, corrupt Governments prosper then that's going to easily worsen.
2016-12-08 09:39:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the high tech Star Wars type stuff is what makes the billionaire arms lobbyists and arms merchants even richer! If you want to find an answer to any question asked about Americans just follow the money-it's all our leaders seem to care about these days. The armed forces drive around in unarmored Humvees and get blown to bits by bombs made by illiterate rag-heads because the needs of the fighting men and women are the last thing on the list when defense appropriations are handed out. I know we have a lot of brave soldiers over there...but I'll be damned if I can figure out why they do it.
2007-06-14 16:28:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by georgejet88 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
From my experiences about 9 in 10 IED's are discovered and destroyed with no harm to anyone. But your not going to hear that in the media.
2007-06-14 16:46:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Your doing a great job of dishonoring all of the fallen troops who would tell you they died for their country, not being killed by their leaders.
2007-06-14 16:47:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they have new technologies springing from the IEDs, and the jet is a drop in the bucket of a trillion dollar budget
2007-06-14 17:19:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are incorrect in saying that the military is not spending money to deal with IED's
They have developed UAV's with electronics to detect the IEDs and to destroy them.
The military may not be the swiftest at solving problems... but they do work to keep the soldiers alive. Thats why we've only lost appx 3500 troops... to somewhere on the order of 200,000 dead "insurgents."
Hmm... enemy score = 3500 to US score = 200,000.. that looks like we win.
2007-06-14 16:24:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
most of cost in hi tech cost plus special materials.
also that fly at mach 3.
there not to much you can do about sucide bomber.
maybe we should take pow's and have them walk in front
of the humvees.
2007-06-14 16:30:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by MR TADS 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Planes are much prettier, and they appeal to the little boy in all of the military "high ups". So planes will win out every time.
2007-06-14 16:49:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
5⤋