I'm a Pistons fan, and I totally think the Cavs got to the Finals on a fluke. The Spurs are a great team, I'll admit, but at least we (the Pistons) wouldn't be sweeped :)
2007-06-14 15:35:45 · 15 answers · asked by Sreya T 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
and please, Alice K, you don't have to try to be so clever. Sweeped is a word.
2007-06-14 15:51:03 · update #1
I say the Spurs would still have won, but you're right, Pistons will not get swept. It is hard to guard Rip off the screen. Billups is clutch, and Sheed spreads the floor with his amazing range. I would say 6 games to Spurs. This would be a very boring finals IMO though.
2007-06-14 15:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Clueless 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, no flukes in a 7 game series. A 3 game series maybe, but 7 games is too long for a fluke to happen.
If they can't even get past a Cavs teams that the Spurs are whipping night in & night out how can you expect them to win against the Spurs?
2007-06-14 22:46:07 · answer #2 · answered by riqtan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they can't beat the Cavs, what makes you think they can beat the Spurs?
IMO, those two wins the Pistons got were a complete fluke and the Pistons are lucky they weren't swept.
2007-06-14 22:51:37 · answer #3 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Spurs would take your Pisst-ons YES,, ! So what if the Cavs do get swept, they still made it ,, So that's more than again your Pisst-ons! Sounds as if your just a sore looser! Pisston are not even a TEAM they can't get along ,, thats not a TEAM!And thats a big factor why they are not playing now! ahhhh I don't feel bad for them one bit,, King James has more class in his pinky finger then all of the pistons!
2007-06-14 22:41:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it wouldve been a better series because the pistons play better d but the spurs are just too good. they wouldve won in 6. they can play any way they want. they can run they can play the half court game and they wouldve had the best player in the series in tim duncan
2007-06-14 22:43:19 · answer #5 · answered by jello80 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance. They couldnt beat the Cavs. What makes you think they would do any better. There would be more crying but thats about it.
2007-06-14 22:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by hank_718 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, no. From what I've seen of the Cavs in the finals, beating them shouldn't have been too hard.
We? Detroit has women on the team? Wow.
And please, it's swept. Not sweeped.
2007-06-14 22:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by Alice K 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no because the spurs would have one like in '05 in 6 or7 because we have the same team basically wgile pistons lost a key big man (big ben wallace)
2007-06-14 22:41:44 · answer #8 · answered by Brandon 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if they lost to the cavs why wouldnt they lose to the spurs.
2007-06-14 22:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They would have won some games not get swept like the cheeseland @ssaleers
2007-06-14 22:47:41 · answer #10 · answered by Super 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋