English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...in just a couple of centuries?

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=537836005&context=set-72157600335006271&size=l

Does the Creation "Museum" tacitly endorse evolution?

2007-06-14 15:10:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

7 answers

YES. That is absolutely evolution!

And note that they didn't just say 200-300 types ... they explicitely say 200-300 *species*.

This is *speciation* ... the very process that they insist on calling "macroevolution."

So yes, this is absolutely conceding that huge speciation can occur in a very short time (actually ridiculously short).

So you are absolutely right. If *speciation* can occur so extensively in a matter of a couple of centuries, then just imagine what can happen the course of 100-thousand years ... and then imagine what can happen in 100-*million* years.

This is why creationists are so caught on the issue of the age of the earth. They know that the *process* of evolution can be very productive given time ... so they have to deny that evolution had that time.

Just stunning. Good eye!

2007-06-14 16:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 6 0

They covered their lieing asses by saying "God probably placed this potential into rhinoceroses in the original creation" which proves they are full of it because in the bible it says that the flood was brought on as punishment to man by God, so that would mean God was one vengful SOB if there was a plan for a great flood so far in advaced that the rhino was created with the ability to diversify into 200-300 species in a matter of centuries.

2007-06-14 15:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by Mark G 7 · 3 0

I had 2 miscarriages in 2007 my husband and I never told anyone I was pregnant so when it did happen we only had to deal with it ourselves. Unfortunately I was admitted to hospital with the second miscarriage as they thought it might be ectopic and my husband had to tell his ***** mother as we needed someone to look after our son. She was crying and saying well she should have known I was pregnant (I was only 5 weeks and just found out myself) my own mother didnt even know. A few days later we went round her house and she announced that my husbands cousin was pregnant and SHE had told her mother straight away, couldnt care less about my feelings and the fact Id just lost a baby. Then about a month later we went out for my FIL birthday and because shed had a drink she brought it all up about how she should have known and how it made her feel not once did she ask how I was or how I felt. My husband and I tried to tell her that none of it was about her but it doesnt matter what it is she always turns it around so its about her she has to be centre of attention. She is a chain smoker and smokes while my son is eating or while hes sat on her knee. She gives him crisps and sweets when she knows hes going to have his tea at home. She is basically a horrible person that I have to put up with for my husband.

2016-05-20 23:10:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The Creation Museum is hilarious! As are absolutists who lack the ability to reconcile science and religion. It's sad that people actually pay money to get into that crock of a museum.

2007-06-14 15:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 3 0

Tacitly endorses creation evolution, perhaps. 24 million dollars for a great big lie!

2007-06-14 15:17:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No. They refer to it as 'guided design' which is just another way of saying 'creationism' without actually using the word.
It's 'junk science' and sophistry at it's very worst .

Doug

2007-06-14 15:16:35 · answer #6 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 5 0

Why don't you list each of those 300 types if rhinos to authenticate your claim? Uncle Al is curious to see if any of them are playing professional football.

2007-06-14 15:15:18 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Al 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers