Bill Russells Celtics, Magic and Kareems 1980s Lakers and Michael Jordans Bulls in the 90s are all obvious dynasties.
Would you consider the 80s Celtics with Bird and McHale a dynasty, they won 3 Championships in the 80s, none back to back.
How about the Pistons, who won back to back titles in 1989 and 1990?
Or Shaqs Lakers in early 2000 that won 3 straight?
Most people call these teams dynasties, do you?
2007-06-14 13:51:49 · 4 answers · asked by WestCoastin4Life 7 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Dynasties need 3 consectutive titles or 5 titles within 10 years. Repeating is not enough, winning 3 times straight should be dynasty worthy.
2007-06-14 13:58:02 · answer #1 · answered by saj_flounder 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think winning at least 5 championships within 10 years is a dynasty. Winning 3 straight is great but not a dynasty.
2007-06-14 14:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
teams that win quite a few championships within a short time period where the key players are virtually the same.
2007-06-14 13:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sakic fan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
iono
2007-06-14 13:54:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋