I know the right answer No Hell NO
2007-06-14 13:48:42 · 12 answers · asked by phillykid 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I don't like neither of them and they both suck in my opinion.
McNabb is better than Del WHO????
2007-06-14 13:56:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to say Mcnabb is better than Delhomme. Even though Delhomme is more durable than Mcnabb, mcnabb has better attributes. Such as arm strength and mobility. Plus he lead the eagles to the NFC conference championship game for 3 consecutive years that one time, with basically no receivers around him. When Delhomme made it to the superbowl he had mushin muhammad and steve smith and a good ground game. When Mcnabb finally got a good receiver in T.O. he made it to the superbowl but fell short. then we all know how the T.O. situation ended. Plus Delhomme will now possibly be fighting for a starting job with david carr if carr is good in training camp and plays good in the preseason. Mcnabb's job is pretty much sealed unless he gets hurt again.
2007-06-14 15:25:56 · answer #2 · answered by nick g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think its a simple yes or no..
Basically delhomme is old, and mcnabb is injury prone..
pick your favorate? lol
i am not a big fan of either..
go brad johnson! sigh.. vikes have no qb either.
They can both throw..
but the only diffrence is delhommes old butt cant get out of the pocket.. as long as mcnabb isnt watching from the side lines due to injury.. id tip this in mcnabbs favor, and not by a few points, but more like a landfall..
2007-06-14 13:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by SwiftKill 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
o god why even ask donovan McNabb by a long shot McNabb lead the egals to a superbowl and many will say that jake did to but no he didnt there defence did he just came along for the ride
2007-06-14 15:08:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say no, but not by much. I mean, when both are healthy, they are consistent. But McNabb has that ability to scramble out of the pocket and create something out of nothing, something that Delhomme does not have.
2007-06-14 14:03:17 · answer #5 · answered by coolesticeman2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to say no. He may be more durable than McNabb but not better. When Mcnabb is healthy he is awesome. Look at his winning %. He dome this with guys on offense like Trash, Stinkton, and fat dude name duece. I'm no Mcnabb fan but he is a good QB.
2007-06-14 13:58:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think donavan mcnabb was better when he had T.O to catch his passes but now that he doesnt have him jake delhomme is gonna get more yards and touchdowns, but that doesnt necessarily make him better, and jake delhomme has steve smith as a receiver
2007-06-14 13:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Delhomie is on his way out the door. My Grandma is better than Delhomme.
2007-06-14 15:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by Roundhouse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO although Jake dosen't have as many injuries
2007-06-14 14:11:06 · answer #9 · answered by VBF 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about better but, He is a HELL of a lot healthier.
2007-06-14 14:38:07 · answer #10 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋