That's what it's going for on Ebay.Isn't that insane?
2007-06-14 12:44:04 · 17 answers · asked by Candi Apples 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Heck no, the man was so annoying he talked too much.
2007-06-14 12:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by Chuckie H 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If I liked Bob Barker or collecting celebrity stuff, and I had a lot of money, than I probably would. But I'd rather spend my money on weed and alcohol.
2007-06-14 12:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. Why would anyone buy that? Do they expect that some of Bob Barker's, like, saliva remains in it? I mean, there's memorabilia, and then there's pointless crud that the person happens to have used.
2007-06-14 12:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jenni 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I had $19,000 dollars in spare change I would use it to help alleviate suffering in the world, not buy a microphone 500 times overpriced of its market value....to me, that's a sin.
2007-06-14 12:51:21 · answer #4 · answered by Joline 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wouldn't pay $1 for that, lol but i would pay $$30,000 for a Britney spears' tour suit, or a day with Justin timberlake, lol.
2007-06-14 12:51:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no!! maybe a couple hundred, 900 at the most (if i was a crazed fan) but thats is
2007-06-14 12:55:17 · answer #6 · answered by laugh_alot_lady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is crazy. But maybe I would pay for his hair dye which he no longer uses. lol!
2007-06-14 12:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by cats 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if i was a billionaire hell yes, I would even pay for Vanna White's breast implants, why you ask TAX WRITE OFF!
2007-06-14 12:49:21 · answer #8 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have gave him $19,000 if he would have used a cordless micophone.
2007-06-14 12:50:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I would only go as high as $18,999.
2007-06-14 12:47:15 · answer #10 · answered by sherbert 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋