It greatly disturbs me that the Equal Rights Amendment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Ammendment, proposed in 1972 was not ratified, and it disturbs me even more that it has not yet been reintroduced in congress. Why is this? I can interpret it in no other way than an institutional misogyny. Do you feel the same way? Do you think it should be part of the constitution? If so, why? If, not why? Does it disturb you that it isn't part of the constitution?
2007-06-14
12:33:45
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Sorry, I made a mistake in the link above. Here's the correct one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment
2007-06-14
12:54:09 ·
update #1
The Equal Rights Amendment Has not been Passed- this is a myth purported by those who feel it is unnecessary:
http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/
The Equal Rights Amendment is simple. It reads thusly:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.
Also, I'm a male.
2007-06-14
13:01:03 ·
update #2