English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-14 10:52:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Hardware Other - Hardware

9 answers

It really depends if you like apples or oranges better. Why not throw BSD, Linux, Linspire, or other O/S's into the mix too? Seriously, each one has strengths and weaknesses. If you are familiar with one and like it, you'll be more comfortable sticking with it. Or, make a list of what you want to DO with your computer, then compare which would do it better.

As far as Mac's having better hardware... I'd like to see a Mac compared to an Alienware PC. Then again, the comparison would reverse itself if you compared with an eMachine probably. If you go with a PC, there's a wide variety of hardware quality available. That's what PCs get for free market choice, unlike Macs which are simply made by Apple, period.

Still can't decide? Get a PC laptop and a Mac desktop. Or vice versa. :)

2007-06-14 11:12:48 · answer #1 · answered by toforama 3 · 0 0

Well, technically Mac OSX is a lot better than Vista. The interface is a lot cleaner and more user friendly. Both OSX and Vista have a sort of Aero style. OSX seems to run faster too. But that is only because no one was really expecting Vista to take up so much power. OSX is also safer, because most hackers target Windows Operating systems. But if your a gamer, I would just go with Windows Vista. It is DirectX10 compliant, which is the new gaming standard for High-Definition gaming. But make sure you have a DX10 compliant card like the Nvidia GeForce 8800GTX or the HD Radeon 2900XT. Eventually Vista will become more mainstream and many bugs will be fixed. So either Operating System is good. I couldn't choose though, so I got both=).

2007-06-14 11:06:42 · answer #2 · answered by piNkiShlOOps 3 · 0 0

IBM stands for "I'LL BUY MACINTOSH". I would always choose mac over pc the mac has a great OS it is very user friendly. Also viruses are not the issue thay are with pc's . And more companies are making gaming for macs as they are becoming more popular. Lastly the mac is all inclusive with plenty of power, I'd never own anything else.

2007-06-14 11:08:40 · answer #3 · answered by groovygal 3 · 0 0

Depends on what you are doing.

Mac better for everything but games (because they dont make many games for the Mac).

It is because the OS is more stable.

But if you put linux on a PC it is just as stable if not more stable.

Mac has better hardware in it also.

RJ

2007-06-14 10:57:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is a classic debate question. Macs are generally considered more stable and excellent with graphics and video applications. There are many more programs for PC's. I think the answer lies in the uses one plans for the machine. Lots of good information linked below.

2007-06-14 11:03:55 · answer #5 · answered by david42 5 · 0 0

again with this question! MAC is good for two things and two things only: no viruses and graphic design.PCs are good for everything but the system can get viruses, but if you take good care of your PC and give it proper maintnence then you should be fine. more programs are available in PC more hardware is available for PC everything is available for PC. oh and if you're really scarred of viruses get Linux and you will have a PC with the advantages of a MAC (along with the disadvantages of games)

2007-06-14 14:46:47 · answer #6 · answered by captn_sal 3 · 0 0

PC.. deff,
its wayy more convineint,
All games and programs that are more used are in PC forms not MAC and PC equipment is sold anywhere and MAC you have to find a special store to go to.. its just such a hassel..

2007-06-14 11:01:52 · answer #7 · answered by kailee=] 3 · 0 0

Macs are easier to use, have cooler programs and features, and don't get viruses.
So I think they are better.
But there are people that swear by PC too, so I guess it's just a matter of personal preference.

2007-06-14 11:01:38 · answer #8 · answered by pir8 6 · 0 0

You make many well features. I reside in canada, and it's no distinctive right here. Like you mentioned kids ought to be handled as so. I grew up in a residence wherein admire used to be a given and being a tender youngster, I needed to earn my location, my admire. slowly however most likely, the youngsters we see in these days are given no limitations or is it that no limitations are allowed to be made by way of mom and dad or society? We are elevating a new release that blatantly is aware of it isn't important in the event that they shot any individual or come residence once they like, seeing that truthfully, what are you going to do approximately it? The help procedure for mom and dad and residents alike are being part stepped. Go to a counsellor and you'll be able to see, it becomes "good what would you do greater as a father or mother? Not even conserving the youngster dependable for improper doings. Family values were changed with video video games and tube tops. Children are raised in daycares while small seeing that each mom and dad or one has to paintings to be capable to get by way of. It is a social accountability all of us ought to be dependable for, now not simply mom and dad. Children are the predominant recognition in amusement and being "unhealthy" is glorified, being a plastic woman, is glorified. I am comfortable to mention even though this 12 months my daughters tuition has changed beck to the conventional tuition and considering the fact that she spends so much of her day there, I am comfortable to grasp that the morals and values I instill in her shall be applied there as good. I would cross on approximately this without end, however I simply desire to mention thanks for a excellent query.

2016-09-05 16:49:22 · answer #9 · answered by sawaya 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers