I'm sure you're referring to the infamous lie in the State of the Union address, "The British government recently learned that Saddam Hussein tried to buy significant quantities of uranium from Africa." It was a lie when he said it and it's a lie now. And Bush KNEW it was a lie when he said it because career intell guys at the CIA and NSA told the WH it wasn't true, and removed the reference from a specch Bush gave in October 2002. But somehow it popped up again three months later. How convenient.
Than again, Bush has never once in his useless life had to concern himself about the consequences of his actions, which makes him the perfect puppet for the neocon cabal.
2007-06-14 09:49:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by wineboy 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Funny question because it isn't the truth at all.
This forged document that was the centerpiece of Joe Wilson's false accusations, was never considered valid by the administration, nor was it used to justify the attack on Iraq.
Wilson's actual report, which said a delegation from Iraq had met with the trade minister of Niger (they weren't looking for pottery), and British intelligence reports both supported the fact that Saddam had sought to buy yellowcake. But neither of these were based on the obvious forgery you speak of.
Who puts these stupid lies in your head? Some lefty loony website?
2007-06-14 09:54:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I am sure as a human being he has remorse but as the president he was going on the information given to him by other people presidentally he can not show remorse like you want him too he has to keep this the country you so like living in. Surely people do not actually believe that this man wanted our men and women to die and be injured for no reason at all.
But it is easy to sit back and judge when most of us don't hold a public office, don't work for anyone who does hold an office or even know someone who does isnt it.
2007-06-14 09:51:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sarelda 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
That and the picture of the "high purity aluminum tubes" for the fuel reactor to process the uranium.
These tubes were at least 10 times the diameter that is usable for this purpose.
The Physicists at Green River told him this before hand.
PhD Nuclear Engineering
2007-06-14 10:04:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by sprcpt 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your question is a compound question containing many false premises, as in "have you stopped beating your wife?"
Joe Wilson himself said he did not dispute Bush's claim that Saddam was seeking uranium in Niger.
Incredible? Yes. I'll find the link.
PS "I never claimed to have "debunked" the allegation that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa."
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/05/07/con05233.html
Bush's speech referred to British intelligence, which stands by the story, not to any documents found to be forged. Your assertion is simply incorrect.
WHY DO PEOPLE ACCUSING BUSH OF USING LIES AND DISTORTION OFTEN RESORT TO THOSE TACTICS THEMSELVES?
2007-06-14 09:47:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Not a hell of a lot, he thought he could win a war quick and go down as a great president. He's losing big time, like the whole Middle East in a shot, and will be remembered as the worst president ever period. It will take a Kennedy and a Roosevelt and maybe a Clinton combined to mend all the shattered fences when he's out of there.
2007-06-14 09:45:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
No. no longer many human beings have been conscious different than Bush and the administration and the intelligents agencies who instructed him it became faulty. Its a fact that has been shown. study the e book "The Italian Letter" it probes the total buildup and exposes the liars.
2016-12-08 09:20:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by walpole 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
your talking about the Yellow Cake from Africa right ?
bush Never feels remorse. He thinks that God made him President and that he can do no wrong because the hand of the Lord guides him.
2007-06-14 09:48:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Your facts are screwy but your intentions are right.
Notice the Top Contributors are all spitting hate? That's how they became Top Contributors. NeoCons are good at this.
Bush doesn't feel anything. Him, nor any of his people who contribute to the death of brave soldiers and innocent civilians every day. The Machiavellian philosophy of tearing down everything to go after the "devil" only leaves devastation in its wake. More devils rise from the devastation because that's how it goes. Guess what? Who suffers?
Ordinary people.
2007-06-14 09:48:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rothwyn 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Your question is way off base. He did not do what you claim. Why not send you question directly to Mr. Bush, to see what he has to say? Got the guts? You will have to put your name and address on the email message.
2007-06-14 09:46:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
3⤊
1⤋