English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So they can compete with Rush and Hannity? Damnit liberals! If we don't learn to hate your fellow Americans more, you will never be able to compete with these talk radio icons. C'mon, I know it is hard to hate fellow Americans, but talk to your conservative neighbors and get some ideas."Spread the Hate and we'll win in' 08."

2007-06-14 08:27:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

LOLOL

It can't be done. Neo-cons are genetically, hate filled creatures. They are like Africanized honey-bees, infesting communities as they spread their messages of hate. To neo-cons, hate is like oxygen, without it they would perish. Every neo-con based talk show is founded on and fueled by telling their listeners who to hate and who to fear.

2007-06-14 08:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 9 1

As much as I would like to, I just cannot "Go ahead and hate My neighbor and Go ahead and cheat a friend" I am a sanctified,die hard, stuck in the mud, stubborn, 'I shall not be moved!', tree hugging, put away that gun and let all get along! Democrat! I believe we should help the poor just like the good Lord told us to! I do not believe in Judging others for the very same wrong doings that my own party(and family members) are doing!

2007-06-14 17:47:45 · answer #2 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 0 0

Hateful rants like those by O'Reilly, Hannity, Rush, and Coulter may be effective on the mindless masses (of conservatives), but intelligent liberals prefer the witty satire of Stewart, Colbert, and Franken. To each his own.

2007-06-14 15:35:57 · answer #3 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 3 0

LOL very good I love the slogan.

Yeah, the Republicans get so frustrated when they rant and rave like cavemen on Starbucks, and we just kinda giggle at them and go on with our business. The really crazed ones have gotten so irelevent, they have to claim more and more outragous things, just to keep their names in the public perspective.

I used to listen to Rush. Yes, it's true, "My name's Bert and I'm a Dittohead."
"Hi Bert"
Anyway, as big a liar as Rush is, he still entertained, and for a while there, he actually let people call in to his show who would challenge his opinions and positions. Now it's all just Dittoheads calling in, telling Rush how great he is to be broadcasting to millions while whacked out of his mind on illegal Oxycontin and exhorting America to line its drug addicts up and shoot them.

Only if we can start and stop with you, Rush.

I just got so sick of the lies and the vast numbers of listeners who seemed to just suck up whatever drivel came out of his drugged up mouth, I simply couldn't listen anymore. Like I said at first I bought into the whole rap he was spewing, but then, I started questioning some of his really outrageous statements, then mor eof them, then more, until finally I coulldn't ignore the fact that almost everything coming out of Rush's mouth was designed to mislead, confuse, alienate, divide and otherwise tear down true Free Debate in this country.
Do you know why Air America is losing money? I have a feeling I do. Here in Metro Phoenix, Air America was fairly popular. Lots of commericals, which I understand, they're in debt, and while some of their radio personalities were annoying, most told enough verifiable truth about Iraq, the War, Osama, etc (things the so-called "liberal" media never mentioned) to pose a serious threat, like a Blue (State) virus in a healthy Red (State) body, it had gotten in and was spreading.

Within 6 months of broadcasting in Phoenix, Air America was gone. How? The radio station owners sold the station, they were offered approximately 11 times the station's worth (no English speaking radio station in either California or Arizona is in the top 5), got it, and immediately switched the format to Christian talk radio. Which has since shut down.

"Media Matters" a nonprofit Watchdog group, has literally dozens of pages on its site, listing hundreds of violations of fair and factual reporting guidelines honest journalists use.
He admits falsifying statistics, using bad mathmatics, misquotes (those which arent complete lies to begin with) to further his own ultra conservative agenda. He admits he gives out false data, but he excuses this by saying he is "baiting" his opponents.

2007-06-14 15:56:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Compete with Rush and Hannity.... not exactly things I want to do...and why would I want to hate anyway. Hate is a BAD thing.

2007-06-14 15:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 5 0

eh.... cons are losing it... after the 06 elections they apparently believe the reason is because they weren't extreme enough and have been moving more extreme as they go...

if liberals stay where they are, they will appear to be the rational, kind alternative to the conservative insanity...

2007-06-14 15:35:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The problem is, we are actually capable of coming up with our own opinions and thus we don't need people telling us what to do and think.

Stewart, Colbert, and Franken do a good job at irritating the right. (Well as long as the right can figure out that Colbert is satire.)

2007-06-14 15:31:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

they tried, Air America was a disaster......and liberals don't need to learn to hate.... they have perfected it.... just read all the Hate Bush/Blame Bush/Hitler Bush posts on Y/A...

2007-06-14 15:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 0 3

Electing Hilary is enough.They'll go into such frenetic spasms of fury that they'll start self immolating and then we can get on with the business of a hate free America................................

2007-06-14 15:33:06 · answer #9 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 3 4

When they decide to become neo-cons...LOL

2007-06-14 15:32:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

fedest.com, questions and answers