2007-06-14 06:07:53 · 10 answers · asked by rie 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
Just imagine if we did, films would then need to be retitled;
Lord of the Walks
The Walk
The Curse of the Walk
then, what about the saying - a walk in the ointment, how time walks, as the crow walks, to walk off the handle, etc.
Never gave a thought how useful wings are, without them the English language would be somewhat duller and have to be edited.
2007-06-14 06:57:45 · answer #1 · answered by cairn4lodge 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say it would be called an eat-your-dinner-then-regurgitate-on-it-pest. As it should be called
I don't think the names of any other things would have changed because the first noticeable thing that man saw fly was a bird.
BUT I guess we wouldn't have fly swatters
but then again we wouldn't need them because we would be able to step on them,then they wouldn't be bothersome
2007-06-14 07:23:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! I'd call it a cab. With the great distances that flies must travel, it would take forever for a walk to take them where they are going.
2007-06-14 08:36:03 · answer #3 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and a fish with no eye is called a fsh.
2007-06-14 06:10:31 · answer #4 · answered by Nickynackynoo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's known as a zip. But if it's not closed, it's called a flash.
2007-06-14 06:16:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're Funny! How about a wingless fly.
2007-06-14 06:13:02 · answer #6 · answered by beesting 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OMG! If they had no wings, they would be so much easier to kill! LOL Great question!
2007-06-14 06:10:35 · answer #7 · answered by Tropical Mango 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes i would.
2007-06-14 06:14:26 · answer #8 · answered by kg22 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we shud we shud
2007-06-14 06:21:29 · answer #9 · answered by eayrin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yey we could kill them then! good question hmmmm??!!!!
2007-06-14 06:20:16 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋