Modern (20th century) physics handles situations where particles are very small or are going very fast . Classical physics breaks down in those scenarios. Modern theories must include the classical theories as their low-energy limits.
2007-06-14 06:05:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Classical physics didn't touch upon things like quantum physics. Newtonian physics would have thought that you age exactly the same no matter what speed you are traveling at, for example.
2007-06-14 06:01:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In classical physics the atom is considered to be the smallest part that an element can be broken down into.
2007-06-18 05:02:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by johnandeileen2000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Modern physics has quantum physics and relativity equations.
2007-06-14 06:00:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
cm is dealing in macro level where as modern physics u can see both and u can relate one to other
2007-06-14 06:04:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Naddi S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bohr type depicts the atom as a small, definitely charged nucleus surrounded via electrons that commute in around orbits around the nucleus. It opposes the well-liked physics in this type of way that the nucleus is definitely charged and surrounding it are the negatively charged electrons. it remains utilized in this type of way that it illustrates the ordinary uncomplicated residences of an atom. the undertaking is that it lacks preparation with reference to the protons and neutrons. beneficial and non charged particle.
2016-12-08 09:07:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋