Lakers vs nets, all of those games where blowouts, at least the Spurs where kind of enough to let the Cavs comeback a little.
2007-06-14 05:47:55 · 16 answers · asked by dynasty 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
At least the ratings bring in higher TV ratings.
2007-06-18 05:36:30 · answer #1 · answered by Hi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
spurs and cavs by far.
at least the Lakers had Shaq *a real bball player
and Kobe (ok so he's a rapist now, but he wasn't then, so its not like watching Bruce Bowen and the goons play against the Cavs, the hapless Cavs; who can't hit any outside shots, and look like a clone of the Pistons, with Lebron added on). Seriously, what is more boring than this series. At one point during game 4 I watched the Cavs go down, miss a shot, and the Spurs went down and missed a shot. This continued for about 5 minutes. I mean, come on, this is basketball. Princeton plays the 4 corners offense with backdoor cuts and everything, and they could outscore these guys.
And don't give me the "spurs play defense" crap. That's bull. These guys can't hit sh!t from outside. But they can dunk. Anybody can play defense when you are allowed to foul with your elbows, and hack people, and kick them, ect.
The Spurs suck. The Pistons suck. The NY Knicks aka Bricks suck.
and now, it seems the newly reinvented Cavs have turned around, but only by trying to play like the above hated teams.
Its awful. Its jungle ball, and I won't watch it, or at least very little of it.
2007-06-14 08:24:00 · answer #2 · answered by fields r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kobe/Shaq or Duncan
Exciting or the most boring man ever
I'll go with Kobe and Shaq... as a fan of neither the Cav's and Spurs, I actually don't like either, I sure wish this series was more exciting. I only planned on watching a game 6 or 7.
2007-06-14 06:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by cub_fan07 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would think that the Spurs vs. Cavs series are alot more boring.
1. No highflyers
2. No crazy passes. (behind the back)
3. Also the spurs just dominated without even really trying.
Those are my thoughts.
2007-06-14 06:20:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lakers vs. Nets
2007-06-16 15:15:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one likes the spurs, and they are near the bottom for teams to watch. They also have players that a lot of people don't like as well like Bowen, Ginobli, etc. The lakers-nets series was when everyone liked the lakers and they dominated the game. People would watch just for kobe and shaq.
2007-06-14 05:54:34 · answer #6 · answered by myfinalheaven817 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
at least with the lakers the scores got past 90 and 100. 75-72 is NOT exciting basketball. looks like a wnba score. can we see that score at the end of the 3rd quarter for the FINAL game (which will be game 4). break out the brooms for the sweep because the spurs will put an end to this bore fest of an nba finals
2007-06-14 05:54:38 · answer #7 · answered by earL 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Spurs vs Cavs is more boring because there is no showtime with Spurs. Kobe and Shaq were doing alley oop. Kobe was dunking. It was very exciting.
2007-06-14 06:11:24 · answer #8 · answered by pb.fan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the Nets were the worst Finals team of all team, regardless if the Cavs are going to suffer the same fate.
2007-06-14 06:06:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spurs and Cavs are not only boring, it is pathetic.
The Spurs gave them every chance to win the game and they still couldn't do it.
2007-06-14 06:05:35 · answer #10 · answered by hamthugger 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
spurs vs cavs, not only is it really low scoring and boring, but you pretty much know who is gonna win. at least with the nets and lakers, either team has a chance to win.
2007-06-14 05:53:39 · answer #11 · answered by what? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋