English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

MTV, no doubt in my mind. they don't even play music anymore, its just crappy reality shows.

2007-06-14 03:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i'd sacrifice all the TV networks and save a million kids for each one, I don't watch TV anyway, so that is an easy choice.

2007-06-14 10:54:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I dont see the connection here-as to how getting rid of a TV network could possibly feed starving kids.
But if it could, i would get rid of Lifetime. Im so sick of those Anti-Male shows and mindset they promote.

2007-06-14 10:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Disney because the kids alerady have Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon.

I'd get rid of Fox news because they're a bunch of communists.

Why get rid of BET?

2007-06-14 10:54:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would not mind sacrificing the entire TV network.

2007-06-14 10:53:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Golf

2007-06-14 10:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Lifetime!

2007-06-14 10:53:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Heck, keep all the networks.

2007-06-14 10:53:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bye-bye Fox!

2007-06-14 10:52:50 · answer #9 · answered by Iggy 7 · 1 1

I could sacrifice any one of them, and never miss being able to watch them again.

2007-06-14 10:54:34 · answer #10 · answered by barbwire 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers