Which came first? The sexy swim suit model or the scantly, i mean bearly there, two piece bathing suit. Because with out the suit you just have a naked chick, and without the model well i guess you have a piece of floss and a blind fold?
2007-06-14 03:28:36 · 9 answers · asked by jasontekken 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
my roommate
suggested
that you may be dealing with
some repressed homosexual tendencies
i told him to shut up
but we couldn't stop laughing
(at your expense)
2007-06-14 03:51:10 · answer #1 · answered by mrlucky 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every culture has had it's sexy swimsuit models. In Victorian times they just showed a lot less skin. The more skin we end up showing the harder it is make it sexy, because nothing is left to the imagination, and imagination is the seat of arousal.
2007-06-14 03:38:20 · answer #2 · answered by Caffiend 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The model is definitely first and would be sexy with or without the swimsuit. Do they really put those things in the water?
2007-06-14 03:46:05 · answer #3 · answered by Fr. Al 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sexy model.
2007-06-14 03:45:57 · answer #4 · answered by peter m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which came first? I would imagine it was the guy who saw the sexy naked chick.
2007-06-14 03:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by runningman022003 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer the bathing suit.
2007-06-14 03:44:30 · answer #6 · answered by syasya 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the swim suit
2007-06-14 03:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by megan_trigg2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't this a question for Visual Arts? Philosophically speaking, IDGARA.
2007-06-14 08:29:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither came first. What came first was the Penis, and it's search for fufillment in all it's glory...everything else....came after.
2007-06-14 03:32:20 · answer #9 · answered by Lilly 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋