The Parents, Family members and Family friends don't seem to take such an interest in being against circumcision as much as gay men and do take interest in more important, life-threatening issues in the care, treatment and well-being of Mother and child than gay men so why do gay men oppose a very common practice that has very few fatalities and though circumcision may be a pointless and unnecesary cosmetic amputative surgery for when there are more important issues that need taken care of and that need everybody's attention have no meaning for gay men! Why a silly cosmetic amputative surgery and not health care and poverty issues???
2007-06-14 02:50:31 · 11 answers · asked by Like It Is! 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Newborn & Baby
Gay men take no more interest in circumcision than any one else. And the reason it is so important is the very reason you say it is not. It is unnecessary, cosmetin, and amputative. It is a human rights issue, and those are pretty important to me. It is something thats need to stop, and ranks right up there with poverty issues, and is actually already a health care issue. This question is very steriotypical and generalizes, and actually is kind of contradictive.
2007-06-14 02:59:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I do not think this is true for only gay men. I am a heterosexual woman, opposed to forms of male and female circumcision. They're quite different, and the male version is not harmful over the long term (reduces transmission rate of HIV, actually). But both have been done over the centuries for the wrong reasons (culture/religion), and I do not think most male circumcisions are necessary. I'm not sure why gay men take particular issue with this practice. Maybe they recognize that it is a rather cruel procedure to perform on a newborn's body?
2016-05-20 01:14:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boy are you ****** up. Penis cutting is very often a gay fetish. Many gays (as indicated in pro-circ blogs) prefer cut and the tighter the better. Many have had theirs re-done to get tighter.
In many cultures circumcision is a totally gay thing.
Intactivists are heterosexuals, mothers, fathers, grandparents, and even some homosexuals. They are not just a bunch of gays, but rather a mix of people that see a terrible wrong being done to baby boys and want it to stop, just like they got female mutilation stopped in this country
Maybe if we stop mutilating our baby boys and invest that money instead in their education, those bright new minds could come up with solutions for all those greater causes.
2007-06-14 06:45:16 · answer #3 · answered by cut50yearsago 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If, by your admission, circumcision is pointless and unnecessary, then why do it? There are many people who are against this practice. It is rather barbaric. Some people believe that there is medical need for it. However, a few centuries ago, people also believed there was a medical need for blood letting.
2007-06-14 02:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Whoa, man. I've seen some bizarre agendas on here but this one may take the cake.
What, exactly, is your research base for this assertion?
2007-06-14 02:59:33 · answer #5 · answered by Dalice Nelson 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I have no clue what the heck your talking about. Sounds like something pulled out of thin air.
2007-06-14 03:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by SexyMamaTo3 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
First off, I've never heard of that before. Second: WOW!!! That was one long run on sentence!!!!
2007-06-14 02:57:57 · answer #7 · answered by BoomerFamily 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I've never read or heard anything of the sort.
2007-06-14 02:55:06 · answer #8 · answered by ▒♥▒♥▒♥▒♥▒™ 5 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Never heard that before, you are generalizing.
2007-06-14 02:53:22 · answer #9 · answered by Angela C 6 · 10⤊ 1⤋
because they love penis, every part of it.
2007-06-14 03:10:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋