Now that they are discovering that there were vast oceans on Mars, it seems that Mars was once just like the earth Billions of years ago. As we know there are some things that exist on this planet that just don't justify themselves with the technology humans were capable with. Maybe our race came from Mars, as Mars was a dying planet. They could have put some people on earth to see if they would survive then they came back to help build pyramids, and other structures on the planet, and give them better technology. I know I sound crazy, but its just a theory.
2007-06-14
02:41:57
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
OMG I did not know using the word THEORY would offend so much of the Thomas Jeffersons and Albert Einstiens on Yahoo Answers....it's an IDEA not a Theory...lol Oh My God!
2007-06-14
09:43:35 ·
update #1
Anything is possible.
We would have to have a good team of explorers up there to look for evidence of civilasation. Just sending probes won't be enough. Only humans know what to look for. How could you program a probe to look at hundreds of subtle clues to evidence of a former civilisation?
I have been wondering about the pyramids and the constructions of the Incas myself. I don't know if there is a crane powerful enough to even lift one block of stone of the Peruvian "ruins". How could they make such fine roads without using transits and heavy machinery?
And I still have trouble believing the explanation of the way Stonehenge was set in place. They have fallen-down stones that they haven't put back up. Why? Likely because it can't even be done with our own technology.
2007-06-14 02:53:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by henry d 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any civilization that could have colonized another planet would have left something behind that we would have found by now. Artifacts left on Mars would still be there given the time line from the dawn of our civilization.
But, if some one said to me that they had proof that our genes were manipulated when our species "limb" shot off the "tree of evolution" I would not be too surprised. But even that is a far reach. It would be something that we would do, I wouldn't put it past another. I get the feeling from all that I have read and heard that we seem to be watched. That would be a real good reason for that scrutiny.
2007-06-14 02:55:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by mike453683 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not a very good theory because you have no evidence to back any of it up. You are going to need to find evidence that shows humans came from Mars. Maybe a million year old spaceship buried in the sand somewhere.
You may want to read up on what a theory is. In the world of science, it does not mean complete guess. In the world of science, a theory is backed up by evidence and research.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories
2007-06-14 02:45:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mars became prepare diverse than earth. confident mars had water and a atmosphere as quickly as upon a time. It nonetheless does water ice on the poles and under floor. the ambience it skinny. we can see that with the mars rovers and the satellites orbiting the planet. the undertaking i think of is Mars center began to harden way before than earth and it does not have the nuclear reaction that earth does on the middle. So, Mars misplaced its Gravitational field and the image voltaic flares from the sunlight stripped the ambience away killing the planet. I shouldn't say kill, it ok ought to even right this moment help small styles of life. we can could pass there to confirm that. The Volcano performed a roll on Mars, in spite of the undeniable fact that it did no longer make a contribution to the loss of life of the planet.
2016-12-08 08:59:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are star children, we all have the same basic compounds as planets and universes, We will be the people that find other planets and populate in order to sustain human life. We are the aliens. It has not happened yet but it will. We are like a cancer that has to spread and grow in order to survive. If we do not enialate ourselves first. We find that we have to have H20 in order to produce fuel,oxygen,food. The space station first, The moon them the next place will have to have some kind of water in some forme. PS. The moon has H20 deep within the creators, deposited by meteors passing by the moon, we will practise on the moon first then GROW!
2007-06-14 03:12:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by gkmaloney 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are bags of water. 80% water. We would of had to come from a place that had lots of water. If the atmosphere was to be like ours, then the gravity would not be enough to have the vast ocenas of water like we have here.
There is a way to get a heavier atmospehric pressure with out the mass of the planet going up such as Venus, but that would leave telltale sighns in our bodies. There are none.
2007-06-14 02:49:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by eric l 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously, your theory has to be backed up by some evidence? Of course your own theory is going to be biased and be considered a "very good" theory. However, I don't agree with your theory based off the lack of knowledge we actually have about planetary science from billions of year's ago.
2007-06-14 02:47:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by jaowli 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not a theory, it's a hypothesis. Any good dictionary will explain the difference. The scientific meaning of theory is quite specific, so please don't misuse the word. I'm getting a bit sick of fundamentalists saying that evolution is "just a theory", when they don't even know what the word means because it is so often misused.
2007-06-14 09:08:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't have a theory, you have a hypothesis. A theory requires at least one tiny shred of hard evidence of some kind.
I like your hypothesis though! I've written some sci-fi stories and your ideas could make a dandy : )
2007-06-14 03:03:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chug-a-Lug 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a plausible thought. And it's as good as any theory until disproved. At this stage of discovery, one can only imagine. Hypothesize, and dream!
2007-06-14 02:56:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by jamoca 7
·
0⤊
0⤋