2007-06-12 20:45:33 · 15 answers · asked by sk_077 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
The players also are to be blamed.They should not be allowed to have say in the selection of coach.
2007-06-13 04:55:14 · answer #1 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem in Indian cricket is that former cricketers doesn't like to do coaching courses as coaching is a specialized job and one has to be a qualified hand to take over the job. Secondly all our sub continent countries are very much impressed with the white skin and consider them some thing out of the world. Thirdly our own "heroes" have no respect for country mate coaches.
2007-06-13 06:58:42 · answer #2 · answered by dua 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a good question and a star for you.......
Indians are very talented and hardworkers proved in world cup 83 victory by Kapil Dev & team. Unfortunately the same stars of that world cup are completly out of the selection and decision making committee.The worst part of Indian cricket is unethical approach towards the sport and domination of power.
Mastermind of present selection committee and decision makers believe they can mess more if they go with foreign coach. Present committee is much more depends on "Execuses ". No long term planning........let's wait till things turn on favourable way......
2007-06-13 19:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Coaching is a specialised profession and need specialised skill and as such even best players cannot be good coach. Though there are many good ex-cricketers in India there is no one who has taken coaching as a profession. That is the main reason why many countries go for foregin coaches.
2007-06-13 05:27:15 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main reason why the BCCI is going after International coaches is that they have more discipline, skills and management for the team.
India has good coaches too but when it comes to management Foreign coaches are more talented.
2007-06-13 03:08:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
me too want some former Indian player to be our next coach, instead of any foreign coach. we had a very bad experience of our last coach. too much experiment only no result , so it'll be batter to appoint some good Indian coach.
2007-06-12 22:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by chinmay sahoo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you recognize how Wright and Kirsten have been diverse from Fletcher? They themselves used to coach with the group. on a similar time as the group replaced into warming up or exercising, they could be a piece of the group. A coach is as fundamental a factor of the group as the different participant. they must be proactive. it somewhat is the place Duncan Fletcher floundered. training isn't a blue collar activity. Fletcher ought to have a lot of journey as a coach and an incredible cricketing awareness, yet what good is it whilst he fails to motivate the group as a member of the group. additionally, as somebody suggested, the coach himself desires to be in advantageous condition bodily to coach a set. as a result, a youthful individual must be favorite. i think of Sourav Ganguly ought to take delivery of an supply. he's an particularly frank individual and does not mince words if prefer be.
2016-10-17 02:46:18 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brcause indi either complains all the good coaches out with cocky players, or tey follow others sucesses, and try to steal that effect for their team, but its not the same. THis happens again and again uless the attitude of certain players changes.
2007-06-14 13:42:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The case is our Indian coaches are not proved.
For ex, Mr. Ford (rejects the offer) who is termed as the best coach for kent.*
2007-06-12 20:53:38 · answer #9 · answered by tdrajagopal 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because every Indian's are not Like one.
2007-06-14 03:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by abhishek 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋