It's not like they're spamming YA with 911 stuff.
6 years after it happened.
Need more time? Zzzzz....
2007-06-12 16:59:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
the factor i hit upon maximum suspicious - greater so than the *seen* squib explosions; greater so than the places of work being cleared out the weekend earlier than the crumple; greater so than the thoughts of all the firemen, policemen and witnesses (or perhaps all of that's reasonably persuasive) - is that the BBC *stated* that WTC 7 had collapsed mutually because it grew to become into nonetheless standig in the background. The stay satellite tv for pc feed with ease vanished interior a couple of minutes, and the BBC have in view that claimed they have lost the tape of it - "because of cock-up, no longer conspiracy." Is that even achieveable? fortuitously others saved it and uploaded it, so we are able to all see it for ourselves. a great number of documetaries available; a great number of rebuttals and many scientists and chemical engineers on the two facets giving diametrically opposing critiques on a similar archives... yet there is extremely no rebuttal for the undeniable fact that the BBC knew it grew to become into gonna crumple, an entire 20 minutes earlier it did. that's the main damning piece of information, because of fact it grew to become into so unintentional. it extremely is like somebody mis-examine the memo, or in line with danger the ink on the fax have been given smudged, and that they made a enormous mistake by danger, panicked, then compounded it by utilizing attempting to cover all of it up. So, yeah, i do no longer think of it is so user-friendly as "Dubya is ebil and the gubmint doned it" yet imo they have been controlled demolitions.
2016-10-09 02:28:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by clubbs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋