Democracy is a system that use checks and balances thoughout the government and it's nation.
Even If a person is charges with first deagree murder of a hit and run. This person may be bail out of jail and will get away this terriable crime.
Democracy even needs prove to put someone in jail, but sometimes for example, OJ Simpson was already been charges of murder before.
There were enough proof to put him to jail but instead, he was off free but without his million dollars he made from his football career.
The system was not just only corrputed, but also it was screaw up and being too fair that they don't convicted the guy with enough proof.
The problem is lack of power, and the only way to get power is though dictatorship or divine monarchy.
If we have the type of government like that, things can get done and there will be less problems.
Total control over everyone so that justice can be done fast and simple without debates and delays.
2007-06-12 15:10:23 · 5 answers · asked by ? 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If you find a good moral person, than dictatorship is not corrupt.In my system, there will be courts. Courts that only collect thre proves of whatever and What the person says, gos, depending on the crimes they did and the proofs of crimes
2007-06-12 15:27:38 · update #1
Note: The way I will run dictatorship, I will let the church to elect the best dictator for the job
2007-06-12 15:28:29 · update #2
Though there are certainly flaws in the system, do you think absolute power is truly the answer? We have a system of checks and balances to prevent this. The "innocent until proven guilty" ethic protects the innocent. This is extremely important (and progressive) because, yes, some people actually are innocent. Is it really ok to let them fall through the cracks? Shouldn't they get an equal opportunity to present their case? Certainly people who don't deserve to go free, walk. It is a sad reality, but then you are not so much attacking democracy as our court system (which happens to be in a democratic country)--and then it all comes down to whether or not you believe in the importance of the individual. I do. We need these "debates" and "delays. They are essential to a free society. Finally, you mention corruption. You don't think dictatorships are the most corrupt of all?
2007-06-12 15:17:59 · answer #1 · answered by starrygirl2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. but who will have this control? true some, ok probably a lot of guilty people get away but if it was a monarchy or a dictatorship you could get killed for the stupidest thing. Democracy is slow and sometimes unjust but concentrated power is definitely not the answer. scary, scary stuff.
2007-06-12 15:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by oneword 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democracy has nothing to do with checks and balances or the judicial system. Those are part of our constitution, but not part of democracy.
Democracy is where everyone gets a vote in how the government is run. The problem with the United States is that it is a Representative Democracy. We vote for representatives to "represent" us, but not for the laws themselves.
Democracy is great. Nothing in life is easy.
2007-06-12 15:15:16 · answer #3 · answered by Don't Try This At Home 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. As my AP authorities might want to assert, "A democracy is a poor thanks to run a authorities, inspite of the indisputable fact that that's extra positive than the different equipment we theory up yet." i don't think of HL Mencken's concerns carry a lot weight contained in the thoughts Age. Social media makes it really ordinary for a regularly happening guy to carry a large electorate depending on the rigidity of his personality.
2016-11-23 15:57:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Communism is only beneficial to the powerful and, loafers.
2007-06-12 15:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋