Hillary understands how Washington works...plus she has her ace in the hole--the great and popular Bill Clinton.
2007-06-12 13:22:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by AB17 4
·
3⤊
9⤋
Hillary's bio:
Education:
JD, Yale University, 1973
BA, Wellesley College, 1969.
Professional Experience:
Author
Attorney, Rose Law Firm
Faculty, University of Arkansas Law School.
Political Experience:
Senator, United States Senate, 2000-present
First Lady, President Bill Clinton, 1992-2000
First Lady, State of Arkansas, 1978-1980, 1982-1992.
Bill Richardson's bio:
Education:
MA, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, 1971
BA, Tufts University, 1970.
Professional Experience:
Professor, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2001
Teacher, United World College, 2001
Businessman, 1978-1982
Staff, United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 1975-1978
Staff, United States Department of State, 1973-1975
Teacher, New Mexico State University
Teahcer, University of New Mexico.
Staff Member, United States House of Representatives.
Political Experience:
Governor, State of New Mexico, 2002-present
Secretary, United States Department of Energy, 1998-2001
United States Ambassador to the United Nations, 1997-1998
Democratic Chief Deputy Whip, United States House of Representatives, 1997
Representative, United States House of Representatives, 1983-1997
Democratic Nominee, United States House of Representatives, 1980
County Democratic Party, 1978
Chair, 2004 Democratic National Convention
Executive Director, New Mexico State Democratic Party and Bernalil.
Do you still think Hilllary is the best credentials of all democratic candidates?
While you are at it, check out the other candidates credentials/experience on both sides. Hillary, Obama and Edwards are the least credentialed and least experienced.
Source project vote-smart.
.
2007-06-12 14:39:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
But she hardly passed any significant piece of legislature as senator. She's been around for while, but that doesn't necessarily grant 'best credentials'.
Do look up bills she helped to pass as senator you'll see what I'm talking about. This aspect won't do much to help her job performance really.
But she is well versed in Iraq & war issues. She serves in senate arms committee. She probably has best understanding on Iraq, security issues among Dem candidates. But that isn't only thing the president will do in his/her office.
Look at Bill Richardson. He has been nominated for Nobel Peace Prize 4 times. He's done lot of work as diplomat. Visited North Korea not long ago. He has excellent credentials as diplomat and negotiator. But do people give him credit for it? Probably not as much as he should receive.
Hilary is good candidate, but there is no question she's got that sort of star, celebrity factor behind her more than any other Democratic candidates.
2007-06-12 13:39:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
This isnt a question but just a political statement.
Why many of us do not like Hillary is base on our personal values. If you do not agree with her values then her experience means nothing.
Experience during Clintons years is minimal as nothing happened. Unless you count the war in Kosovo, Mogadishu, the first terror attacks on the world trade center, the USS Cole bombings with absolutly no response on the Clintons parts.
Oh, yeah, dont forget all the tax hikes, which did affect the low and middle class. Clinton almost eliminated the child tax credit which helps the low to middle class. He raised taxes on the rich which own the businesses and just passed that high tax onto the middle and lower class who pay for their products or services.
Its not a tough job to be senator of NY when you can just flip flop wherever the popular opinion is at during any time. Wouldnt you rather have someone who knows what they beleive and sticks to their principles? Not to mention all the scandals that follow the clintons around.
2007-06-12 13:31:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary and probably Mitt again (perchance even Ryan, yet i imagine he's extra of a small fish). Newt continues to be youthful, he basically needs to improve his spouse sometime contained in the subsequent 4 years.
2016-11-23 15:41:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since when is being married to a politician a qualification? Being a legilator is not very good training for the presidency. Prepare a list of all sitting legislators who have been elected president in the past 125 years. I'll give you a hint. There are only 2 names on it. Being senator from NY is no different than being Senator from any other state. The job description is identical. Republicans don't fear her, we are disgusted by her. Character counts.
2007-06-12 13:26:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
She helped fudge and hide paperwork that showed where the Clintons get their income from and where campaign funding came from.
She was involved when the Clintons were attached to a few mysterious unsolved murders of people in charge in Arkansas when Clinton was in charge there.
I'm sure there are a few more things her and Bill didn't steal from the White House that they might be interested in, but no, how those people are when not in front of a media camera's eye is not impressive to me. If it ain't John Edwards, I'm changing to Republican along with alot of people in PA.
2007-06-12 13:29:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, David I do not support her I believe America would be better served with Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich , or Ron Paul, I have long since been disgusted by the corporate sponsored candidates from both major parties.
2007-06-12 13:25:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
There's a reason to be afraid of Hilary. She is an abusive person. She has emotionally and verbally abused her family and body guards for years. She is a very angry woman. Anger pours from her. She has publically belittled stay at home moms and non-feminists.
2007-06-12 14:14:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Her best "credentials" is her ability to morph into whatever is needed to be popular at the moment.
People are to easily swayed by good speakers. Hillary has zero substance and will become whatever the moment requires to gain popularity.
Hillary supported Bush's war policy until she decided to run for office. How does any anti-war person simply sweep her years of devotion to "Bush's" war aside just because she morphed into an anti-war candidate?
Hillary should be given a cameo appearance in the upcoming "Transformers" movie.
2007-06-12 13:23:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
Living in the White House as the president's wife does not constitute credentials.
2007-06-12 13:24:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋