English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i say tazz or mick foley unless they bring heyman back

2007-06-12 11:24:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

17 answers

ecw cannot exist without paul heyman..

2007-06-12 11:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Heyman, Tazz, Foley, or Terry Funk

2007-06-12 18:32:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They do need a GM. I think it ought to be Shane. Heyman got fired because he and Vince had creative differences. Ratings were low under the Heyman regime, Now its a high rated show.

2007-06-12 18:43:42 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel P 6 · 0 0

Paul Heyman. It is a shame WWE bought out the franchise. ECW is nowhere near what it used to be.

2007-06-12 18:34:47 · answer #4 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

No doubt about it....Paul Heyman should be GM of ECW. He's the one who started the whole ECW thing...he should be the one to run it.

2007-06-12 20:28:20 · answer #5 · answered by markyinthehouse_2002 2 · 0 0

I like the Foley/Heyman idea...but how about thinking outside the box: Hardcore Holly?

2007-06-12 18:28:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Shannon Moore had the look, but Heyman or Foley would be my choice.

2007-06-12 19:14:27 · answer #7 · answered by George C 2 · 0 1

Shane Douglas or Terry Funk



Learn Your Wrestling History

2007-06-12 18:26:18 · answer #8 · answered by Book of Wrestling 6 · 0 0

Yes Paul Heyman and make it EXTREME now that Vince is "dead"

And what is PAB? People against Batista? My bad, People against Batisteroids?

2007-06-12 18:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

paul heyman or tazz

2007-06-12 18:31:01 · answer #10 · answered by ~SURFERGURL_101~ 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers