What do you think about the new creationist museum that recently opened in Kentucky?

Answer 1

Silly.

Answer 2

Heard about it on the news.There is one in Glen Rose Texas been there twice,its been there several years and is expanding,its small.For those of you who keep arguing about the dinosaurs,since they(scientists) claim they can be no younger than 65 million years old,how is it you get all this confusion?Since (scientists) can't decide on how old the human race is.Its certainly NOT 65 million years old.Its simple math and you can't make it work that way hence all the debate.Now creationists put forth the theory,dinosaurs were here first,then were destroyed,hence making the void mentioned in the bible,where was no life.There were no dinosaurs on Norah's Ark,they no longer existed.Now the problem is,that's not true 100% because their is evidence of some dinosaurs living along side mankind.The other problem is if indeed dinosaurs did live 65 million years ago,how is it we have ANY evidence at all?But we do,we have fossils and somewhere someone is wrong.The problem is how to get the time line in line with what may of happened with the evidence we do have.No one has done that yet.Thanks for your question.

Answer 3

Honestly when I first read about this in TIME magazine my first impression was "oh brother". Some of these Bible belt types will never be convinced. Dinosaurs and cave men? Come on! I can't understand why evolution and creationism can't coexist. Evolutionary evidence does not rule out the hand of God in my book.

I've found through experience that in this vast country of ours there is a museum to just about everything, somewhere. I once ran across a museum dedicated to bird dogs. Those dogs that fetch ducks and things after the hunter blasts them out of the sky. Apparently a good bird dog is hard to find. Who knew eh?

Eric

Answer 4

it was a major waste of money that could have been used on charities throughout the nation. these people were so hell bent on making a ridiculous point they failed where they could have really made a difference.
the museum is based entirely on opinion rather than the cold hard FACTS of science. it sad how many people choose to believe made up stories rather that reason. i think the museum has made the creationists look like fools.

and as far as i know it was 27 million

Answer 5

I think its cool and hope to visit it sometime its only about 5 hours away so I will have to make a weekend trip. There are evolution museums why not creation? Sadly science knows less then they think they do about our world.

The lord had them take 7 of every kind of clean animal (Male and Female) two of every kind of unclean animal.(male and female), 7 of every kind of bird (male an female) Taking two pairs of unclean animals was so that one pair could be sacrificed to the Lord, the other pair would be what would continued that species once they got off the ark. Similar with the clean animals/birds only 6 pairs were likely for food consumption by Noah and his family and the meat eater animals.

In the case of dinosaurs he could have just taken their eggs. Water animals wouldn’t have had to be on the arch.

Answer 6

It scares me to dying. no longer in straightforward terms are subject-unfastened science courses around the rustic being decrease or folded into math and language curricula (see the main modern Time magazine cover tale), yet now science instructors ought to conflict creationists attempting to bypass their crap off as science? On elementary, our pupils can not save as much as grade criteria in analyzing, writing and math, and now their going to think of all dinosaurs have been vegetarians and frolicked with little ones interior the backyard of Eden 6,000 or so years in the past. and people ask your self why u . s . a . of america receives dumber by the era. i do no longer understand how lots of you have study any of Ham's incorrect information, however the final public of it deals with attempting to disavow any medical evidence of evolution. i'm not sure what creationists think of, yet it somewhat is the way science works. the main important distinction is, scientists use emperical evidence to teach that a concept is incorrect, no longer conjecture or the be conscious of God. Creationists using this concepts-set are of appropriate to a similar cost as oil companies hiring geologists, enviornmental scientists, etc to assert that worldwide warming isn't occuring so as that they are able to be sure the cost of their product--it is not science, it somewhat is propoganda.

Answer 7

I think that it is really cool! I have believed in creationism all of my life and do not believe in evolution! I am so glad that a museum like this has finally opened up!

Answer 8

its cool that they made a museum out of the creation story, but i think that the content is off. it makes me sad that they spend some $15mil. on a museum that doesnt get the facts right. whats the point of a museum that did something new, but got it all wrong? forerunner i guess

Answer 9

I think it is grooovey babey!!

It is odd the guy playing Jesus had that website "Bedroom Acrobat"....which was to be a sex site.

But I think it was spoof site that got twisted up by the media

Answer 10

I think its funny that they had to remove Adam's first breath from their film clips b/c the actor runs a site called bedroom acrobat that has pictures with drag queens on it