http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/03/market-housing-overpriced-forbeslife-cx_mw_0504overpricedmost_slide_2.html
I believe it is...
2007-06-12 08:58:26 · 11 answers · asked by vtboy99 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ San Diego
could be... California is crazy
2007-06-12 09:01:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to your link, Los Angeles is the most expensive. San Diego is very expensive, but just about every large city seems expensive to me.
But with coastal Southern California, you get what you pay for. Beaches, mountains, desert, valley, city, suburbia, country living, culture.... Where else can you wake up early on a Saturday to ski in the morning, hit the bike trails in the late afternoon, watch the sunset on the ocean in the evening in your tank top and flip flops, then end your day having a good time with friends in the hippest night club?
If you plan correctly it can be done. That's pretty impressive and why I love SoCal.
2007-06-12 17:00:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I (heart) San Diego!
I think it's a way for population control for San Diego. Great weather year 'round and endless beaches on one side; mountains on the other. So much to see and do there.
If it were affordable for all to live in So. Cal., it'd be more crowded than it is today. Overpriced? Have you checked out parts of the east coast?
2007-06-12 15:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by NAB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
prob one of the most pricey... overpriced is all dependent on what people are willing pay for it. Unless you think what it cost now is going to drop in the near future for some reason it's not overpriced. I actually hear San Diego is quite nice.
2007-06-12 09:02:11 · answer #4 · answered by icpooreman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Check out realtor.org. They post reports on median house pricing by geographical region. I lived in San Diego until three years ago. When I left, realtor.com had SD pegged at #5 (San Fransisco and Orange County were the other two Cal regions that were higher-priced yet.)
2007-06-12 09:04:25 · answer #5 · answered by one_n1ce_guy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I presently have a house on the industry a pair of mile from the place many homes burned so I relatively have given this some concept. i think it may impression the industry in the quick term. you presently have around 2000 families who prefer residences and there are 2000 much less residences obtainable. for this reason, furnish is down and demand is up. I comprehend that many would be desirous to lease, yet others won't prefer to place their families in a low priced condo sources for the twelve months or greater it is going to take to rebuild. for this reason, uncomplicated economics on furnish and demand says that the charges of homes will pass up.
2016-10-09 01:50:32 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. The Washington D.C. metro area is pretty darn ridiculous. And sine I live in a rural area being hit hard by it, I would have to vote for this area.
2007-06-12 09:01:56 · answer #7 · answered by chickey_soup 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is about the third, I heard. New York (Hamptons area) and somewhere else came before it.
2007-06-12 09:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Angelacia baybeeeeee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But it is somehow still growing. I love southern CA!
2007-06-12 09:01:59 · answer #9 · answered by The Reaganite 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
try Greenwich, Connecticut
2007-06-12 09:00:54 · answer #10 · answered by Angelbaby7 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋