His warmongering puppet masters will probably assasinate him to justify sending a few nukes to the middle east? I cant see the American people falling for another false flag op like 911 or the shuttle crash to whip themselves into another flag waving frenzy.
2007-06-12 08:58:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The SPP (safe practices and Prosperty Partnership of North u.s.) wasn't signed by Bush or anybody else. it isn't a treaty or maybe an settlement. that's a posh call given to a chain of discussions between the three governments on various topics like border safe practices, commerce, environment, and so on. If any agreements easily come out of it, they'll might want to be ratified and applied by each and every authorities following its own regulations. for sure the president doesn't have the flexibility to "signal away" our sovereignity. If any president even tried to do some thing so stupid, it would want to immediately be rejected by Congress, the courts, and the american human beings. And he'd immediately be impeached and removed from workplace. i'm no longer apprehensive about that ever taking position, yet I do difficulty that the massive improve in our nationwide debt below the Reagan, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr. administrations might want to progressively erode our sovereignity. numerous the money replaced into borrowed and continues to be being borrowed from different international locations. The extra we owe different international locations, the further leverage they have over us. If we do not get our nationwide funds so as, that's conceivable that faster or later contained in the destiny, different international locations might want to rigidity us to do issues by refusing to lend us any extra funds. If it may not borrow in yet another u . s ., the U.S. authorities might want to might want to strengthen charges of interest significantly with the intention to borrow adequate funds locally, which may set off a serious recession. If our selection replaced into, for instance, a serious recession or giving in to China over Taiwan, which may we do? It sounds a methods-fetched . . . inspite of the indisputable fact that that's no longer no longer conceivable.
2016-11-23 14:47:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem hell bent on being stupid and not knowing how legislation works here in America! Besides, he would never sign off sovereignty to a Republican...only a liberal would.
2007-06-12 09:11:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He plans on raising a false flag somewhere and then declaring martial law. Under that martial law he will dispense with Congress and the Supreme Court and become a dictator. It is what he has stated more than once that he wants.
2007-06-12 08:54:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Neither will occur because Congress would need to approve either of these options. Since I believe that Congress will be reluctant to support the President, none of these things are likely to occur.
2007-06-12 08:52:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
sign away our sovereignty. He is working on creating the North American Union or something like that.
2007-06-12 08:55:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
He seems the kind of president most likely to invoke some sort of 'emergency powers' declaring him "Lifetime President"
2007-06-12 08:57:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Honestly I'm surprised that he hasn't pressed the red button to blow us up already. He must be thinking to himself "But it looks sooo shiny!"
2007-06-12 08:57:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If the news reports are accurate, you won't have to wait that much longer...
2007-06-12 08:53:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Floyd G 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, It doesnt work like that ..
2007-06-12 08:54:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Antiliber 6
·
1⤊
0⤋