That's right. I really hope you aren't an American, if so our education system is far worse than I thought.
2007-06-12 08:56:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mark S 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
"There was a strong correlation between the number of plantations in a region and the degree of support for secession. The states of the deep south had the greatest concentration of plantations and were the first to secede. The upper South slave states of Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Tennessee had fewer plantations and rejected secession until the Fort Sumter crisis forced them to choose sides. Border states had fewer plantations still and never seceded."
"American Civil War : Slavery as a cause of the war" : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War#Slavery_as_a_cause_of_the_war
"The term border states refers to the five slave states of Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, and western Virginia which all had a common border with Northern Union states. In some of these states, there were both pro-Confederate and pro-Union governments, factions and men (sometimes even from the same family) that fought as soldiers on opposite sides in the American Civil War."
"West Virginia was formed in 1863 from the northwestern counties of Virginia that had seceded from Virginia after Virginia seceded from the Union. In the cases of Kentucky and Missouri, the states had two state governments during the Civil War, one supporting the Confederacy and one supporting the Union."
"In addition, two territories not yet states—the Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma), and the New Mexico Territory (now the states of Arizona and New Mexico)—also permitted slavery. Yet very few slaves could actually be found in these territories, despite the institution's legal status there. During the war, the major Indian tribes in Oklahoma signed an alliance with the Confederacy and participated in its military efforts. Residents of New Mexico Territory were of divided loyalties; the region was split between the Union and Confederacy at the 34th Parallel. Oklahoma is often cited as a "border state" today, but Arizona and New Mexico are rarely, if ever, so characterized.'
"Border states" : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_states_%28Civil_War%29
2007-06-12 16:23:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Erik Van Thienen 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not all the rebels were from the South because some of the citizens of the Border States (Kentucky, Maryland, and West Virginia) fought for the South and some fought for the North.
2007-06-12 16:49:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, absolutely the rebels were from the South or as the states that seceded from the Union were called "The Confederate States of America"
2007-06-14 00:09:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeremy S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes the South was called the rebels and the North was called the Yankees.
2007-06-12 15:57:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Luv you! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The term "rebels" as given to the 13 southern states that seceded from the union in rebellion of the national government to recognize states rights.
2007-06-12 16:38:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robster01 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. They were rebelling against the United States of America, trying to break off into their own country, the Confederacy.
2007-06-12 16:23:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by micahcf 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
For the most part yes,although they had plenty of sympathisers up north,the so-called copperheads being the best-known. Some states were dragged in,like tennessee and believe it or not there even a few neutrals who essentially left the Union but didn't join the C.S.A.,Maryland being the most important.
2007-06-12 16:18:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Galahad 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Affirmative
2007-06-12 15:57:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Step into the Freezer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Correct
2007-06-12 16:04:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by staisil 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-06-12 15:55:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Hamilton L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋