use misinformation and old stories that have been long ago debunked (Clinton Hit List, Black Panther story, White House china/furniture) to rag on her? Don't any of them ever check their facts? They tell these lies and then act morally superior about the Clintons while they're telling the lies. I can respect people who talk about the issues and why they disagree with her but the fact is that there is little of that in these forums.
How do you justify telling these lies and then feel morally superior about it? I'd really like to know.
2007-06-12 08:02:09 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Actually "bravo" it's NOT speculation. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to prove that by your comment. Here is the debunking and real stories behind those that I mention:
Clinton furniture/china/silverware story:
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/GT2c11.htm
Black Panther/Hillary story debunking:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp
Clinton Hit List debunking:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
2007-06-12 08:38:47 · update #1
Amen to that Michael. Most of them are so scared of her I can imagine them wetting themselves if she wins, which she has an excellent chance of doing.
2007-06-12 09:05:11 · update #2
Steve C:
I'd bet my next advance that you've never read "It Takes A Village." I have. It does not embrace Marxist ideals. The gist of it is how to return to the day when we gave a damn about each other.
About how she remembers, as I do, the way our neighborhoods used to be. We knew all our neighbors and all the parents watched out for ALL the kids, and dragged us home by our ears if we were messing up. Now we have to check a website to find out where Harry the Child Molester has set up shop in our neighborhood. She wants to try and return to the days when we didn't isolate ourselves from each other in our own neighborhoods and watched out for each other so the "state" doesn't have to. You should try actually reading it instead of making assumptions, because that's a REALLY bad one.
2007-06-12 10:29:42 · update #3
Sadly, I think it's because alot of people have made up
their minds without giving her a chance.
I watched an interview she gave to Cynthia McFadden on
Night Line & I think she's a wise, caring person who would
make a great president. After spending 8 yrs. in the
White House, she has to have great experience.
If people would just listen to her without making their
minds up first, it could change everything.
I could go into how every American has an opinion about
Paris Hilton without knowing her personally, or how
people are critizing Micheal Moores documentary &
it hasn't even been released yet, but I'll it just let slide.
Or, I might go crazy.
2007-06-12 08:13:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 10⤋
Personally, I have a sneaking suspicion- that there are a fair # of Conservative "dinosaurs" out there- who are frightened at the possibility of our electing a woman for President. I'm REALLY hoping that I'm wrong about this... -that it's JUST the "Clinton" name that's causing all the angst about Hilary running. But seeing as how all the Republicans running- are "whitebread" & male, and pretty much "gung-ho" about the war (& an issue favord more by men -than women), I have a sad feeling that Clinton may be battling a gender "bias" in this Election. It's too bad- too; because she's smarter & better qualified than most of those on either side of the political fence.
2007-06-12 18:58:23 · answer #2 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
She's a liar
She's a cheat
She just badmouths Bush.
She wants to surrender so those villans in the middle east can make another attack on the US.
She doesn't stand a chance against our country.
If she can't control Bill Clinton, how can she control 50 states?
I can go on forever.
2007-06-12 22:13:39 · answer #3 · answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Neo-cons use lies. President Bush declared war on Iraq based on a lie. Newt Gingrich was having an illicit affair all the while slamming Bill Clinton for the Monica Lewinsky deal. Ted Haggard, an evangelistic advisor to President Bush was doing meth and having homosexual trysts. Mark Foley, while acting holier than thou, was chasing male pages. It goes on and on and on. They are hypocritical liars for the most part. There are a few Conservatives who are decent people. Most of them are just playing politics and they play the game by lying. For them it's about image and not truth.
2007-06-12 15:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
It is important that Senator Clinton be smeared so that big shot crooks can continue looting the economy. Billions of dollars are as stake. A competent, capable leader is a luxury these looting thieves cannot afford--they need a happy, smiling, glamorous feel good kind of symbolic president who will wave the flag a lot, slander unpopular minorities like gays and Catholics and Mexicans and Greeks and (well you get the picture) while issuing regulations that allow the big shots to continue their looting and plundering. And frankly, if the public is stupid enough to buy this crap AGAIN, they deserve exactly what they get.
2007-06-12 15:37:55 · answer #5 · answered by jxt299 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Why do they do this? Because they are so desperate to avoid paying high taxes for the government services our nation desperately needs -- not to mention the rebuilding of their beloved armed forces that their beloved George Dubya has crippled with his moronics -- that they will do and say ANYTHING to avoid another Clinton Presidency -- this time, a WOMAN! It scares the hell out of them! Which, of course, takes a lot of scaring! That's how terrified they are. They'd rather have Bill back. They're so scared of Hillary winning, they'll actually vote for a pro-choice candidate, Rudolph (Adolph) Giuliani.
2007-06-12 15:54:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
she is unliked because she is very devisive
she is unwavering in her belief that money should be taken away from the working class & given to those who refuse to work
she refuses to tell the truth
flip flops on every issue
depending on the crowd she is speaking to
I could go on but those who know the truth wont vote for her
2007-06-12 19:23:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is a rabid Marxist. Her ideas all stem for a core belief that the state must come first and the individual must submit to the will of the state. "It Takes a Village" is a prime example of the arrogant derogation of the family and elevation of the state.
2007-06-12 16:52:38 · answer #8 · answered by Steve C 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Well you brought out the best of YA on this question, hopefully some more will pay attention. It is easy to tell the people what you will do once in office, it is another to be able to actually achieve anything you promised.
Hillary simply is plugged in, she has the connections the plan and the backing to pull it off.
To answer your question jxt299 had it spot on.
2007-06-12 19:01:57 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
It sounds as if you're describing either extreme leftists, or extreme conservatives. They'll never change. Don't even bother. Just cast your vote.
2007-06-12 15:06:56 · answer #10 · answered by Beat the odds 3 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Didn't she vote FOR the war? Wasn't she in Walmart's executive board? What is the difference between her and Bush? What is the difference between demos and repos?
No choice. No democracy. Quite simple.
2007-06-12 16:44:51 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋