Make up a math question about what percentage of Paris Hilton's actual sentence she spends in jail, and then maybe!
2007-06-12 07:38:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kathleen K 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Zanti3, if the situation was reversed, where everybody talks about the Poincare Conjecture, and the news and entertainment media is full of talk about elliptic functions and modular forms, and questions such as "How can Shakira shake her hips like that?" are only found in obscure journals published by nearly blind old men, I think I'd find it more intriquing that Shakira could shake her hips like that.
2007-06-12 13:17:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scythian1950 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"At the time whilst the Qur’an was once discovered, individuals suggestion the arena was once flat" Educated individuals have identified that the arena is circular when you consider that the historic Greeks labored this out approximately 2500 years in the past. They knew that for the duration of a lunar eclipse the shadow of the Earth is noticeable at the moon, so the sunshine of the moon is mirrored mild. The writing of the historic Greeks was once identified to early Muslim students - there are Islamic internet websites that provide an explanation for this in element. "Further, the Qur’an additionally mentions each residing factor is product of water. Every residing factor may also be made of both wooden, stone, copper, aluminum, metal, silver, gold, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, oil, water, cement, concrete, and so on." Steel and urban had no longer been invented 1400 years in the past. Living matters are product of extra than simply water. The undeniable fact that residing matters include plenty of water is understood to any prepare dinner. If you fairly have an curiosity within the historical past of technological know-how, please research the field. You are making such a lot of fundamental errors that it makes you appear ridiculous.
2016-09-05 14:00:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shakira is more likely to be interesting to a greater percentage of the population, though. To each his own. People look at me funny when I read "Astronomy" magazine in waiting rooms, rather than watch whatever game show is on. No reason to feel offended.
2007-06-12 07:36:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by JLynes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because, in general, the amount of interest the public has in a subject is inversely proportional to the intellectual relevancy of the subject in question. I'm afraid that the characterization of three-dimensional spheres among three-dimensional manifolds will unfortunately remain forever unappreciated by the general public.
On the other hand, this does allow us to act elitist at people.
2007-06-12 07:49:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by ket_shi87 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Few know who Poincare is, as amazing a person as he was. Sic transit gloria mundi.
2007-06-12 07:40:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, sadly it's more interesting to many people. What can I say, the gene pool could use some chlorine.
2007-06-12 07:41:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You mean in the best of answers or what??
I wana know.....please tell.
2007-06-12 07:35:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by sweet n simple 5
·
0⤊
1⤋