2007-06-12 06:21:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, just another slap in the face after Vietnam.
2007-06-12 06:24:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No...
At the time the decision was made, I don't know of anyone who thought he should have done anything else.
We keep being bombarded by the media telling us how WE all think differently about it. Again... telling me how I think by telling me how others think about it. Tell someone a lie long enough and they will come to believe it. Fine Monday morning quarterbacking after the fact.
"A strategic catastrophe of historic proportions ?" Your question assumes he can just pull up and change course. To what end? "Choice", you say. I see no choice. either we take a stand and demand that terrorism is not acceptable for any reason, or we are subject to it for the rest of time.
I will not apologize to a terrorist for the success of my country.
2007-06-12 06:50:04 · answer #2 · answered by Robert S 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. I think the US could have continued on for hundreds of years, maybe even thousands. Bush has made its collapse inevitable. And with the Constitution gutted, the Bill of Rights just a fond memory, would that really be such a bad thing?
2007-06-12 06:25:44 · answer #3 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you mean the war that all the dems voted for, the one in the country which clinton bombed for the same reasons a decade prior, the reasons that went unresolved?
2007-06-12 06:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Hopefully there will be no war that will top this.
2007-06-12 06:26:18 · answer #5 · answered by ShanShui 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bingo, right on. You got it. His legacy.
2007-06-12 06:24:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋