i am a fond reader of both websites .
2007-06-12 06:15:41 · 12 answers · asked by tony 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Internet ➔ Wikipedia
Wikipedia is for factual information where as Uncylopedia is for non-factual information. As such Wikipedia would be the better location to search for facts while Uncylopedia is a better place for entertainment value depending upon your tastes.
2007-06-12 06:20:54 · answer #1 · answered by Rob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wikipedia is accurate most of the time, but Uncyclopedia is supposed to be inaccurate all of the time, even though articles on Uncyclopedia are occasionally more accurate than the equivalent on Wikipedia.
2007-06-15 13:10:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wikipedia
2007-06-12 11:38:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uncyclopedia. But Encyclopaedia Dramatica is better than both. And Citizendium is lame. By the way, here's a list of most of the largest wikis, in case you're interested in more:
http://s23.org/wikistats/largest_html.php
2007-06-12 20:25:29 · answer #4 · answered by me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uncyclopedia is supposed to be a parody encyclopedia. Wikipedia presumably should be more accurate, although uncyclopedia might be more fun.
2007-06-13 12:31:25 · answer #5 · answered by Paul R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both are great but there are over 700+ other official Wikimedia pages, as well as many other unofficial ones!
2007-06-13 15:02:17 · answer #6 · answered by KurtEK 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wikipedia can give u more info as far as i concern cause uncylopedia is not so accurate
2007-06-12 06:32:09 · answer #7 · answered by yang 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well for school projects and stuff i think wikipedia is better.
2007-06-12 20:52:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if its just for fun, uncyclopedia
wikipedia is good for school stuff, reports, things like that
:]
2007-06-12 06:31:57 · answer #9 · answered by kt lee 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
uncylopedia for sure, much more fun to read
2007-06-12 06:23:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋