Israel will launch first. I can't imagine we'd actually have a soldier enter that country but fly a bomb into it-yes.
2007-06-12 08:47:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by America scarica 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES!
Iran was the target from the start 6 years ago. If you were to take on a large adversary like Iran,, you would first need to take control of their escape routs.
So we first move our ships into the Persian Gulf. Then we take control of Afghanistan, then Iraq. Once those targets have been obtained, then we move even more ships into the Gulf.
At this point we will have control of their EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH Escape. We had already been in the regions to the North. So now the wagons have circled, and the big bad wolf is in the middle with no escape.
We will strike at night. This will be the biggest Naval Air Strike in world history, followed by the largest air strike sense World War Two. We would be lucky to see any ground troops inside Iran. The Air Strike will cause the infrastructure in Iran to collapse, and the people of Iran will over throw their own government.
2007-06-12 13:12:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think we will invade Iran, but not until a new president elected. The people don't trust Bush and Congress will not go along with it. I think Iran should be put back in line they think they can do whatever they want, but we will not invade Iran until after Bush is out of the White House.
2007-06-12 15:27:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by BeyondShadows25 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Unless there is a catastrophic event initiated by Iran that would pull the U.N. together. We know Iran is supplying the terrorists with weapons but our military is already stretched to the limits all around the world....not just in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2007-06-12 15:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mary H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I do not. #1--Iran is supported by Saudi Arabia which supplies the U.S. with a plurality of its oil #2 If we invaded Iran and the countries that support Iran could not unleash their wrath on the U.S., their ill temper will go toward Israel. 3) We fear any weapons of mass destruction 4) The U.S. does not have the military resources to invade Iran and carry out a prolonged mission.
2007-06-12 13:35:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by poppidad 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush and his buddies need another war in order to take away more of our freedoms and raise oil prices even more. I'm sure that the US will stage some sort of false flag event where US soldiers will dress up as Iranians and then attack a US vessel or kidnap somebody or something that could be seen as an act of aggression. Bush will then declare martial law here in the US and he will take away as much of our freedom as he can.
Hopefully we can stay out of war until George Bush's term is over.
If you're interested in freedom, vote for Ron Paul (www.ronpaul2008.com) as our next president. He's the only one that believes in the US Constitution, and all of the freedoms that this country was founded on.
2007-06-12 13:10:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It seems like they are going to do some "strategic bombing." Iran is much more capable of doing damage to our nearby allies in the Mid East, like Israel. I think they will retaliate somehow, and then we will. I predict the outcome will be a mess and disaster, much like our war in Iraq. What worries me is that more congress members than I would have thought are supportive of the strategic bombing, and our military simply won't stop there.
2007-06-12 13:08:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by HachiMachi 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont think so. We are to bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan with less than desirable results. The American people arent up for another invasion and they would be no support for it. I think it is going to take a new president of the USA to unify our lost allies, Germany, France, Spain, and our friends in the middle east to take a bilateral position to make iran back down.
2007-06-12 13:08:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
Why? We are not moving mass troops into the area around Iran.
A better bet is Africa.
The Army has been drilling water wells there for 6 mos.
Bush has made a point to say we need to help.
2007-06-12 13:14:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A yes what do you think. bush is a oil hungry self centered idiot. i have been watching the hole war on terror idea in South Africa and it does not look good. its like our stupid nurses and and teachers on strike here bring SA to a halt. bush will do what our government did to our nurses yesterday. kill off the pawns (the fired every striking nurse) or send in more inocent boys to a country that is doing well. bush only wants oil and to look like an idiot. do a search for Zapiro cartoons on bush, he has got him spot on like madam and eve also pictured him, an idiot. as long as bush has oil to steal, countrys to F@#$ up and headlines to make, his invading life will go on. so take a look at things from a global view, it is not pretty. also if bush really wanted to kill Sadam why did he not get a sniper. get your best sniper and and send him to Iraq. then when he has a chance put a bullet in his head. no mess and only one life lost, the right one.
P.S. our strike is on day 12 and not any better. for more info E-mail me at micric@michaelhouse.org subject box yahoo answers. two school boys got beat up on thursday because they were wearing school uniforms. the bullys were teachers. a woman in labour had he baby die inside her as she was in need of a doctor and had to wait 12 hours for help. it bad.
2007-06-12 14:07:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Not as long as the United States is in Iraq. Unless there is some catostrophic event that would dicate such an action.
2007-06-12 13:09:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by tony51451 3
·
0⤊
0⤋