Top Dems --- including Bill and Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi and Kerry and Kennedy --- fought very hard to allow doctors to continue crushing the skulls of babies who could live outside the womb via partial birth abortion.
Do you support their dreams of once again making it legal?
"The physician will then either crush the skull or will use a vacuum to remove the brain and other intracranial contents from the fetal skull, collapse the fetus’ head, and pull the fetus from the uterus."
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/PartialBirthAbortionRecentDevelopments.html
2007-06-12 05:53:50 · 12 answers · asked by tip zz 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They don't care...after all they don't get pregnant with human babies...they only carry soulless, lifeless masses of cells in their uterus for 9 month's.
2007-06-12 06:03:13 · answer #1 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I gotta say. Every time I hear about how this procedure is done. It absolutely makes me want to vomit. Abortion period makes me ill just thinking about it, but this one takes the cake for me.
Supporters claim it is used only in extreme cases of a threat to the mothers life.
Guess what? My wife is pregnant and I went to one of her appointments with her and just happened to have an article about this fresh in my mind and asked her OBGYN about it.
He said RARELY, if a womans doctor is keeping up with her health would he or she not know something is amiss much earlier in the pregnancy. If they just suddenly deem the pregnancy a risk, and it's obvious that the woman is and has been under a doctors care, then that doctor shouldn't be practicing.
He won't do this procedure and doesn't know anybody that will. He did say however, that make no mistake. There are those out there that want this to be able to be used as a form of abortion as common as all the other types of abortion procedures. Mostly as a revenue generator and that's all.
I know in my heart that anybody that could do this procedure for money, and anybody that would have it done for "convenience sake", has no heart or soul. Just like suicide, it is one of the most selfish acts out there.
2007-06-12 12:06:04 · answer #2 · answered by scottdman2003 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The so-called "partial birth abortion" only represented a tiny percentage of abortions being performed at the time it was banned.
Also, this type of abortion was almost never used as a means of ending an unwanted pregnancy. This was a procedure performed by a woman's doctor when continuing a pregnancy was deemed inadvisable, and when other means of ending the pregnancy were more medically invasive & risky for the woman.
2007-06-12 06:22:55 · answer #3 · answered by missusjonz 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
You again.
If they decision is to save the life of a mother or that of a fetus, the mother gets the nod hands down. At 6 months it is not birth control!
Aren't you also going after the pill as you claim it is a monthly abortion which could not be farther from the truth.
You can use all the descriptive terms you like, but you wash your hands of the child once it is born.
The decision should be between a person and her Md, not yours!
This might help you understand what we do to the living children!
http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Iraq_War.htm
2007-06-12 06:06:18 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
That is painful to hear. Abortions are an evil answer to life's hardships.
2007-06-13 04:36:57 · answer #5 · answered by vincefoster 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For legal advice and legal information, go to this blog
http://usa-legalcare.blogspot.com/2007/05/legal-care-by-legal-experts-click-here.html
2007-06-13 01:12:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is hysterical ranting, nothing more.
People who would be moved by this are already opposed to Hillary Clinton as President of the U.S.
What a waste of five points this was for you.
2007-06-12 05:58:35 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
This makes me sick along with most of the answers so far. I'm not sure who could commit this act let alone the heartless morons that support it.
2007-06-12 06:51:23 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Why do people like you want a welfare state?
Honestly, if abortion was illegal, who would pay to support the millions of unwanted children around the US? Taxpayers, thats who. The foster care system would be overwhelmed and orphanges would have to re-open to care for all these welfare children.
For people who claim to hate welfare so much, you guys sure like to make sure people are dependent on it.
2007-06-12 06:01:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
those are typically only used when there is a health problem.
the procedure shouldn't be illegal, having it done for reasons besides medical/life threatening ones should be illegal.
2007-06-12 08:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋