What do you think of the United State's policy on gay marrige?

Answer 1

There is no policy. I think there should be one. I am with the right on this one though.

Answer 2

There isn't a policy on gay marraige in the United States of America. Maybe one of the states has one but that's why it's a federation. Power is in the state.

Answer 3

I think the attitude is that marriage is a matter left best to the laws of the individual states, and that the US Federal Government will take no action in requiring one state to recognize or accept gay marriages granted in one state to be accepted in a second state.

I don't think it is fully developed as a matter of law at this time. And probably as is will continue to ban gay marriage as a 'must accept' alternative lifestyle.

Answer 4

It's a shame we don't have a policy on gay marriage. Come on people get in the 21st century. What are people afraid of? I don't understand. If you think only in monetary terms, if you allow gay marriages those spouse could be placed on their spouses medical insurance if they have none of their own.
That could take some people off medicare if they are low income. A whole new way do look at things. Why too does the govt have to agree with a life style to allow it legally? If not allowing gay marriages a policy I do not approve of it.

Answer 5

i do no longer understand the Republican celebration point of view regardless of the undeniable fact that i understand the commonsense point of view and as a source I relatively have user-friendly experience and a 4th grade information of biology. The definition of marriage is a union between a guy and a woman. it is organic and could stay the definition of marriage. the main objective of marriage is procreation and a risk-free good ecosystem for elevating a kinfolk. I comprehend existence would not continuously artwork out this manner regardless of the undeniable fact that those themes could be addressed rather of coming up the region worse. i do no longer care if same-intercourse human beings prefer to be companions regardless of the undeniable fact that do no longer call it marriage. human beings have already got the nicely suited to grant everybody they like power of lawyer to make existence companion form judgements approximately somebody else's sources, scientific situation and virtually all the criminal themes that exist for married couples. the 1st couple in Illinois that have been given married in San Francisco claimed they did this because of fact they needed their companion to make the scientific judgements for them in the event that they're injured. They claimed they had to make confident their companion could pass to them in the well-being facility if something handed off and not be excluded because of fact they weren't legally seen kinfolk. they did no longer point out those rights exist already and the 1st factor they did while they have been given married grew to become into sue between the mens employers Dean meals to get reward for the different guy so he could end working and be a stay at domicile companion. Their regulation healthful confirmed the actual subject grew to become into approximately reward and had no longer something to do with what they claimed. i'm confident they're going to get social protection as a companion and a great selection of different products designed for the classic issue the place a woman might lose working years because of elevating a kinfolk. that's basic to get scientific coverage regardless of the undeniable fact that maximum all of us is too stupid to appreciate this because of fact they have basically sucked off their company. call Blue pass Blue safeguard and you have coverage precise away. FYI: a great number of the Democrats are agaisnt gay Marriage besides. verify voting information and comments.

Answer 6

You mean the "pass the buck" policy?

It's NOT up to the state, because the states who do have marriage doesn't amount to diddly squat on the federal level.

The "policy" should be inclusive of all Americans... not just a chosen few.

Someday it will, of that I have no doubt.

Answer 7

1. There is no such policy.
2. There is no such thing as 'gay marriage'. You must be talking about 'homosexual marriage'. Please don't contribute to the further corruption of my native language.

Answer 8

WHAT POLICY?