if the batsman completely misses the ball and is out of the crease and the wicket keeper catches the ball and knocks off the bails with his feet while the ball in his hand....is it considered out?
2007-06-12 04:40:43 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
No the bails have to be dislodged by the ball or the hand actually holding the ball.Otherwise it's not out.
2007-06-12 04:48:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is clearly no, but if he has ball in hand he can remove the bails with the arm of the hand holding the ball, also, not what was being asked, if the ball was to hit any part of the wicketkeepers body and rebound immediately onto the stumps this also a stumping if the batsman is out of his ground. Any chance of rebuilding the wicket to do the stumping properly would mean that the batsman is extremely slow.
2007-06-15 05:15:34 · answer #2 · answered by Tony M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the ball has to knock the bails off, it is also considered not out if the keeper hits the stumps with his fingers instead of the ball.
2007-06-15 16:38:36 · answer #3 · answered by Emmersonne M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i think after capturing the ball, it is only the wicket keeper's gloves that can knock the bails. And that would be considered as a stumping out.
2007-06-12 12:23:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The bails will have to be dislodged by the ball or the hand holding the ball if the batsman has to be made stump out.
2007-06-12 12:19:49 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe not, in fact if I'm correct, if he knocks the bails off with anything other than the ball (or the glove the ball is in), he would first have to replace the bails before he could run you out or stump you
2007-06-12 11:48:38 · answer #6 · answered by dave w 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The ball must be in the hands of the wicket hilekeeper while dislodging the bails.
2007-06-16 10:04:27 · answer #7 · answered by Kantham J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
got to knock the bails off with the hand holding the ball
2007-06-12 11:55:36 · answer #8 · answered by polly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply put No, the ball must be in the hands
2007-06-13 07:45:04 · answer #9 · answered by 2 cent philosopher 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not the feet but outerside of his hands only when he has the ball in his hand then the batsmen is considered out. Not feet nor the body
2007-06-12 11:50:50 · answer #10 · answered by rohan v 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋