Surely you're not surprised, are you? I'm not. These less educated, less intelligent, underachievers are all expecting to get something for nothing and under the Hillary regime, they're right. After all, socialism is just that, isn't it? It will make those who are dumb the equals of those who are not.
Eventually the smart achievers will give up because there will be no incentive. The plan is to 'dumbsize' all of us so that we're all totally dependent on the government for our own good.
2007-06-12 04:41:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
I'm not sure if she is a feminist, as a politician her political goals have always come first and that means she has had to compromise in some areas that someone with more definite convictions may have chosen not to. However, she is a strong woman, and has shown she is able to deal with public life and as a person who moves actively and effectively in the wider world. In that respect, yes she's a good role model to say to younger women "you can achieve, but you have to work hard and there are consequences which are not always what you might imagine". I'm not sure if she's a good role model for women 'everywhere', because outside the US things are managed differently. For example, in Australia political candidates don't go through the lengthy process Obama and Clinton have just endured, so things are very different. Regarding her marriage, etc, her personal life is her own business, but there is no doubt she has raised a fine daughter who is a successful person in her own right, and also that she has close family ties with her family. Cheers :-)
2016-05-18 01:23:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's sad when lower income groups buy into the pandering of leading Democratic politicians who don't give a rat's behind for those individuals. They know income levels are dynamic. Government will never be able to provide a high standard of living for anyone. The best thing government can do is get out the way. Reduce taxes, reduce all the regulations and restrictions, and just go away. Go back to your districts and live with the people you're supposedly representing! Find out how you can increase the economic situation in your community. Leave us alone!
You're teaching your daughters well. I teach mine the same thing. Hillary Clinton is not a good role model.
2007-06-12 04:46:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matt 5
·
6⤊
5⤋
Well, I am not so quick to judge people I have never met...but I think the reason is because she supports the things that affect these women...healthcare, reproductive rights, etc...and since women are over half of the population, they have a voice. It hurts me deeply that there is so much hatred for a woman simply because she didnñt marry well, or because she chose family over an education, or whatever. I think these women have just as much of a say in this world as women who choose education and career first. And lastly, I do not think that less educated means less intelligent. As a woman, she is a great role model in the same way that Julia Childs was...Me and Julia dont cook the same way, but she paved the way for me to be in the kitchen, competing with men. I owe her a great debt.
2007-06-12 04:39:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
4⤊
5⤋
Some women want a woman president in the worst way. Naturally, these women support Hillary.
2007-06-12 05:40:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
She has a stronger lead in her party than any Republican has in his. She must be doing something right.
2007-06-13 09:04:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear God! I'm hoping Hillary won't win. Period!
Besides, her *** is too big for the President's chair.
2007-06-12 15:26:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jennifer 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Great structure and framing !! LMAO , I Love it .
No , she's a terrible role model . What is it that these Clintons have been able to fool women ? Hocus Pocus , Magic , or is it feelings ?
Anyways , I'm really gonna enjoy reading these answers .
2007-06-12 04:45:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
I think Hillary, while no angel, certainly isn't any worse than those who spend all of their days bashing her and Bill Clinton.
One thing she has over the neocons, is that she doesn't spend an obnoxious amount of time on the high horse, judging people. Maybe she actually realizes that judgment is God's job.
2007-06-12 04:40:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
6⤊
5⤋
She is a horrible role model....but yikes about the less educated/ less intelligent....
not everyone is raised with the expectation of going to college....
2007-06-12 04:39:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by penydred 6
·
2⤊
6⤋