I don't think Bush knew about it, but his handlers did. That's why they didn't immediately remove Bush from the classroom where he was reading a book (they knew there was no immediate danger to him).
That's also why Bush had no clue as to what to do, how to act, or what to say. His handlers hadn't coached him or told him how to respond.
The people who pull Bush's strings as he dangles like a wet puppet were reluctant to tell Bush for fear that his "deer-in-the-headlights" look would give it away. They didn't dare tell him because he'd spill the beans.
The Bilderberg Conference decided that Bush would be President while Cheney was actually the brains behind the administration. They only tell Bush things that he can't screw up, or that are incidental to their plan for world domination. -RKO- 06/12/07
2007-06-12 03:33:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't trust George Walker Bush or any of his lying Administration that includes Richard Cheney, Karl Rove or any of the former members of his Administration that are members of the PNAC and that includes Cheney, former Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, Former Deputy Secretary of Defence Paul Wolfowitz and Former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney Scooter Libby. If they had connections with 9/11 it will never be proven and if they did have connections with 9/11, they will get their own in the end as they will definitely not go to Heaven as theirs will be an
eternity in Hell.
As far as George Walker Bush being religious, he may be a born again Christian in his own books but in reality he is a dangerous man who has his own agenda and values which are right out of this world. He may be religious but he is a religious nut case.
2007-06-12 05:43:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow some one neglected their medicine... for the previous couple of years... The "evidence" you assert Truthers have is a similar evidence repeated many times back. It supplies no longer something that can not be disputed. Repeating a similar drivel many times back does not make it desirable. the people who prepare the "evidence" the truthers use forget approximately approximately info and edit out concepts that contradicts their "evidence". additionally i will locate "evidence" that radioactive area monkeys run the international area station and make a dozen internet web pages with the evidence, does that make my argument actual? How appropriate to the reality it somewhat is disproved? in basic terms using fact i ought to in straightforward terms locate in straightforward terms one website that argues my info are incorrect could that propose by the sheer style of sites showing there are radioactive area monkeys it makes my argument actual? As for some ones relation to a pair one else, i'm regarding Antonio Banderas (distant cousins) does that propose i'm to blame for the flicks he makes? final time I regarded on the inhabitants on the east coast it remains rather insular, you will locate cousins or family of a few sort, very almost on each and every block (somewhat in case you’re catholic, i understand i'm Catholic and that i prefer a calculator to function up all my kin). Truthers hate info, in the event that they did no longer they could coach how steel weakens at a rather low temperature. recover from it, in basic terms using fact the worldwide's whack’s could make web pages based on a similar insane concept does not make what they say actual.
2016-10-17 00:30:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't you realize that all ex-presidents as well as the sitting president make these kind of decisions. There is a tunnel in the White House that leads them to a base under the Potomac River. It's kind of like the Legion of Doom for guys in pinstriped suits. VP's are not allowed into the discussion because they are only sidekicks and therefore only get their information after the initial planning stage.
2007-06-12 03:06:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by tobcol 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Darlin', I don't subscribe to either of those theories. While I do think someone knew something like 9/11 was possible and even in the works. I just don't see anyone wanting it to happen and was complicit in making it or letting it happen.
IF that were the case why haven't the Democrats found out about it? IF they did find out about it why haven't they done anything?
Now back to the what did they know, when did they know it, and what could they do about it. Given the facts that are known to the public. Here's what they knew. People of Arab descent were planning to hijack one or more airplanes. It was unclear what they were planning to do with them. When and where the attacks were to take place was only a guess at best.
What would you have had the government do If you knew male Arabs had been taking flight training and were planning to hijack one or more airplanes from a major airport and crash them into buildings in one or mor major cities in the US sometime after the 1st of September?
Arrest all the Arabs you see? ACLU has a field day with you. Many of them are US citizens. Arrest only the foreign citizen Arabs? The ACLU will have your biblical beast of burden on that one too. Send all Arabs of foreign citizenship home? Can you say ACLU boys and girls?
How about sending all illegal aliens home? The people who pulled off 9/11 (by crashing airplanes not explosive charges) entered this country legally. It was legal for them to be here. Last count 12 million illegals are in this country and many of them are dark complected. Which one are you going to arrest? Where are you going to put them?
Ban all persons who look like Arabs from flying? ACLU is all over you. There are a lot of people who are natual and naturalized citizens of the US who are of Arab descent. You want them to bring their papers to go flying? ACLU again!
Restrict Arabs who aren't US citizens from flying?ACLU is all over you on that one too. There are a lot of Arab students attending US colleges and universities LEGALLY. Not to mention Arabs who are doing business in this country LEAGALLY. They have done nothing wrong. Why are you profiling them? ACLU again!! Are you getting the picture?
Arrest all Arabs who are taking flight training? But what if they didn't get their training here? Arrest all Arabs who have a pilots liscense? That is going to really please the folks at El Al isn't it.
Shut down the airports in all major cities starting Sept 1 until further notice? That cause more damage then 9/11 did to our economy. And even if you did that how long do you keep them shut down? One week, month, or longer?
Really even if you knew the exact city and exact date, what could you do?
Lay off the Sangria, Sangria. It's destroying too many of your brain cells. You aren't thinking logically. Tom Clancy couldn't make the two theories you accuse the President of into a decent scenerio.
2007-06-12 04:46:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Sangria, I agree with you somewhat. I don't think Bush had anything to do with it. Part of my reason for this is I do believe him when he says he's Christian. I doubt he would purposly kill thousands of Americans regardless of his reasoning. Then, I look at his response. The legislation that he passed, the invasion of Iraq, taking Sadaam down. Those responses are not consistent with having a master plan.
As far as Cheney & Co. are concerned, its a possibilty, but he would have to have planned this type of tragedy for at least a decade for it to go as planned. But there is always a possibility of his involvement after learning of the plot.
Very good question.
2007-06-12 03:08:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by New Moon Daughter 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
It's pretty obvious that Bush was out of the loop if it were the governments doing.
9/11 conspiracy stuff reeks of Cheney.
2007-06-12 03:06:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by tiny Valkyrie 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I am more inclined to think that even a Republican would not be capable of killing 3,000+ people on American soil. I'm not a fan of Bush and Co, but the conspiracy theories are ridiculous.
2007-06-12 03:05:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
He's been 'in the dark' for six years. If the light went on he would not know the difference.
2007-06-12 07:54:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Yafooey! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, I think GWB knew lots about it. don't forget, it's easier for an intelligent man to act like a fool than for a fool to act intelligent.
I wonder if his henchmen are locked up in Gitmo, the blackhole of justice.
2007-06-12 03:13:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
3⤊
0⤋