It was supposed to make our enemies drop their weapons and pursue love with the soldier standing next to them. The Pentagon admitted this yesterday. It was to cost over 7 million dollars. Is this the kind of thing our taxes are paying for? I have heard it all now.
2007-06-12 02:50:23 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Source CBS News
BBC News
2007-06-12 02:59:05 · update #1
google gay bomb
2007-06-12 02:59:30 · update #2
Would the next plane after the bombing at least drop condoms? And parachute down some wine and candles? What about romantic music? :)
2007-06-12 02:53:49 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
So much for no gays in the military. Honestly that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. I think The BBC is just trying to develop a sense of humor and some charisma. Both which would cost more in R and D then the gay bomb. By the way, I assume you mean 7 Billion, the US military can't make a plastic gun with a BANG flag for 7 mil.
2007-06-12 06:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well in case you didn't know, we look into a million different ideas, during the second world war we built a "bat bomb" that was filled with over 100 bats all carrying little bombs... we also had one that was supposed to make enemies deaf so and it was kind of just a big reflector screen... we research into a million different plans but very few of them actually make it all the way through
2007-06-12 03:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by topdawg3748 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heard about this sometime ago, just dident work. The pentagon has other less than lethal weapons that do work however. I was kind of intrigued about the sound amplifier for crowd control.
2007-06-12 02:53:40 · answer #4 · answered by trigunmarksman 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don’t know if that would work. Remember the Spartans and Romans were some of the best soldiers through out history and they liked the man love, and were fierce fighters. They say you fight harder for and are less likely to abandon your buddies if you really love them.
2007-06-12 03:12:01 · answer #5 · answered by Injam 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only 7 million dollars. That's a bargain in government spending.
The developers probably got exposed to too much of it and can't tear themselves away from the Lab and have started to redecorate and wear tighter jeans
2007-06-12 02:57:12 · answer #6 · answered by ditdit 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The problem was that, everytime they dropped the gay bomb, it turned around and kept trying to go back in the bomb bay!
2007-06-12 03:30:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rumor? This was on all major network morning news cast for 6/12/07.
This couldn't have been a Republico idea, what would happen if they got some on themselves?
2007-06-12 02:57:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't think it's such a bad idea to deliver a giant happy pill, personally. It doesn't have to be called a gay bomb - ecstasy would do just as well.
C'mon people now smile on your brother, everybody get together - try to love one another right now .. !
2007-06-12 02:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by pepper 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Cool idea, wonder if I can get this in spray form and spritz it around the workplace. Might be interesting on a boring afternoon. Just have to remember to bring my video cam to work that day.
2007-06-12 02:56:22 · answer #10 · answered by griffyn10941 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋