English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it's a disgrace watching teams like the Pirates, Roylas, Reds, Devil Rays & countless other teams never have a fair chance b/c the dear Commissioner Has no guts to make a fair profit sharing system to help these teams. I remember how good the Royals where. They used to give the Yankees fits in the 70's & 80's. The Pirates also had a rich history. Now watching them is sad to watch. I can imagine how older fans of these teams must feel. It's time for selig to grow some & make a system that will help all the teams in Baseball.

2007-06-12 02:40:17 · 8 answers · asked by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7 in Sports Baseball

8 answers

Baseball is a private business. Selig is a commissioner to enforce rules and regulations but he is not a CEO. Since baseball is a private business they make trades and offer large salaries as the traffic allows. But with the unions and the teams being sold or moved every few years you can't get a tight organization with great fan support like in the old days (prior to the 70s). You don't have players staying longer than a couple of years while the tickets are priced so high the average fan can't take the whole family, so until they adjust prices and salaries(no player is worth millions of dollars a year) the rich history won't continue.

2007-06-12 02:48:25 · answer #1 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 1 0

Its not all Seligs fault. I think the system they have set up to get the money to the small market teams is pretty good, but they don't have any rules in place on what the money can be used for. Like other people said, the owners of the small market teams can just pocket the money if they want.

I can remember when the Royals were good, also. When Ewing Kaufmann owned the team he was the 1970's and 80's version of George Steinbrenner. He'd spend whatever amount of money it took to field a good team. For many years, the last one being 1990, the Royals had the highest payroll in MLB. So KC's problem isn't so much of a small market problem as it is a stingy owner problem.

2007-06-12 08:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by DoReidos 7 · 0 0

The luxury tax assures that revenue goes to small market teams. Quite a few simply pocket the money.

Bud Selig is little more than a figurehead. The Players Union runs baseball. The reason there is no salary cap is due to the Union, not Selig.

By the way - that is why you won't see a "salary floor" either. Fehr has said that he'd never support a floor, because that would open the way for a ceiling.

Don't get me wrong - I'm no fan of Selig - but I don't believe in criticizing someone for something he has no control over.

2007-06-12 03:01:36 · answer #3 · answered by Jon T. 4 · 0 0

Baseball has revenue sharing. I know. That probably got by you. The "small market" teams all get over fifty million dollars from the television contract. MANY of them dont even spend that much on payroll. These are not people who are broke. You have to have a ton of money to own a baseball team. They are people who choose not to spend the money on the product. When a team like the Pirates walks off with upwards of 80m from TV, licensing, luxury tax etc. and they do not improve the team on the field with better talent, they should forfiet the proceeds. It should NOT go into owner's pockets.

Baseball needs a salary floor, not a salary cap. Owners should never be allowed to let the team and its fans languish in mediocrity. Basebally has reached a level of parody it hasnt had in years. Different teams are winning the WS every year, and a couple of new teams get shuffled into the post season every year. If your team isnt participating the way it should, it's THEM you should complain to.

2007-06-12 02:52:58 · answer #4 · answered by Toodeemo 7 · 0 0

The Yankees dish out more to the Devil Rays in revenue sharing than the Devil Rays spend on payroll

2007-06-12 02:49:33 · answer #5 · answered by john r 3 · 0 0

No amount of money can compensate for idiocy in the front office. Nearly 20 years of Herk Robinson, Allard Baird, and now Dayton Moore as GM has done more harm to the Royals than the team's financial limitations.

2007-06-12 04:51:51 · answer #6 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0 0

i'm inquisitive about Homegrown skills, with a crew that useful properties homegrown skills such as: Ryan Braun, Prince Fielder, Corey Hart, Rickie Weeks, Yovani Gallardo, Lorenzo Cain, Alcides Escobar, Jonathan Lucroy. Zach Braddock, Michael McClendon, i comprehend how major that's. Veteran Pitching has executed little or no for the Brewers with the aid of loose organization or trades. i respect seeing the Brewers pointing out those adult adult males and seeing them be triumphant. I basically imagine the bigger marketplace communities get extra press because that's how that's continually been. they have numerous fulfillment and that brings instantaneous ordinary and followers are literally heard loud and clean. i might want to like to work out the Padres, Braves, Rangers and Rays get extra nationwide televised time. those communities are inspiring. such numerous small marketplace communities at one time are lacking one aspect to lunge them into being contenders. The Brewers have tremendous homegrown hitting and offensive skills, the pitching is the position they falter, to that end no longer having the tremendous quantity of money or a GM who has a prepared eye for outdoors skills they fall short of being an finished crew. i imagine for followers like you and that i, we do not overlook that homegrown skills is our acceptable shot with probably adequate to receive a pair lacking products with what funds our communities do have and an proprietor, GM and manager who comprehend what they are doing.

2016-11-23 13:42:54 · answer #7 · answered by walko 4 · 0 0

Hey...Ever hear of revenue sharing? Big market teams pay a luxury tax, which is distributed to the small market teams. The problem is, that they don't have to spend that money on big name players, and alot of them don't and just keep the money.

2007-06-12 02:45:32 · answer #8 · answered by jim 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers