English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

..that will 24, and possibly, 28 years of the country, of 300 million people, being run by two families. Isn't there something wrong with that scenario?

2007-06-12 02:19:39 · 16 answers · asked by Fred C. Dobbs 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Reinterate - 24 or 28 CONSECTUTIVE years.

2007-06-12 02:30:28 · update #1

16 answers

Yes, it sounds like we're turning into a Monarchy.

2007-06-12 02:21:46 · answer #1 · answered by Karma 6 · 3 0

While the Presidency could be dominated by two families over a lengthy period, lets not forget that this country is run by the people. The less we watch CNN & FOX and the more we read and risk in order to grow as individuals the less power Washington has; because, we are better informed about principles rather than head lines.

If we as citizens make better decisions on a daily basis then, the folks in Washington will to becuase they reflect our voting.

As for Hillary... A very Smart woman; but, God help us if she gets elected because she wants the Government to run everything...If you listen she even says it.

This is a time in which we need less Government not more. The principles of our founding fathers are still true today!
Our Constitution is not a living , breathing document.
It's a map of the Principles we need to survive as a Nation. If we get away from that then we will truly be lost. Regardless of who is in the White House.

2007-06-12 09:54:35 · answer #2 · answered by patriot_corps 2 · 2 0

How could Hillary Clinton possibly lead the country and solve its problems when she couldn't even solve the problem of Bill not being able to keep it in his pants?

2007-06-13 22:47:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If hillary gets in we will have far bigger problems to deal with. Firstly, she will turn the entire country into a liberal utopia like New York, Washington D.C., and Los Angeles, so most of us will be murdered anyway, the rest will be on crack, but don't worry, there will be a 'progrum' for that.

2007-06-12 09:45:48 · answer #4 · answered by Richard P 2 · 4 1

If Hillary is elected,

Monica better move to Canada,

Cause Hillary will have her audited by the IRS once a month

And probally send her to gitmo

LOL

2007-06-12 09:24:41 · answer #5 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 5 0

Not really. Other examples: John & John Quincy Adams; William Henry & Benjamin Harrison; Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt were cousins---in opposing parties; and don't forget the Kennedy's.

2007-06-12 09:25:05 · answer #6 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 1 3

Yes, I know. It would be even sadder if the following election went to Jeb and then to Chelsea.

2007-06-12 09:22:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Like John Adams, and John Quincy Adams, and Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin Roosevelt?

It's happened before - we got through it.

2007-06-12 09:29:53 · answer #8 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 0 2

Talk about a dynasty. I think it goes to show we have no need of career politicians in this country.

2007-06-12 09:23:13 · answer #9 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 0 1

You know you have a good point.
In reality though, no matter who has the job of president we still will be ruled by the same wealthy families.

Still, Hillary is as far from Bush as you can get and right now that looks pretty good to me.

2007-06-12 09:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers