English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i am not talking about the ones who have been just "unlucky" in love, i am talking about those who have tried hard, very hard but have lost in love, everytime.

2007-06-12 02:12:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

10 answers

To be deprived of worldly things does not mean disability at mental level. The idea is not to be too indulgent in anything like " love " in the worldly sense. In love you may be deceived.
Take things lightly. Love may come to you in some cryptic fashion. What is important is to give love to those who come close to you.Giving is more important in life.

2007-06-13 15:19:07 · answer #1 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 0 0

its not a disability...that person either has issues they have to work through or they just have to wait.
Some people may be giving off the wrong signals or might have trouble communicating in a relationship. maybe they are reading their partners wrong or mayb they are simply just choosing the wrong partners. There are an array of reasons why something may not work out. That person has to look at him or herself, not in away that will put them down, but in a way to see how to better themselves in relationships.
I think that person should sit down and evaluate what they want.. really just sit down and think about it..then you have to find an appropriate partner which can meet those needs.
The other possibility is that they just havent found the right person.. which is fine.. thats why people go through so many relationships and all the dating.. it's the search for mr or ms. right,...which takes most people awhile.

2007-06-12 09:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by mon 3 · 0 0

I don't know if you would call it a disability, but some people just do the same thing over and over again, never learning from the experience. Choosing the wrong type of person, or acting in a way that is not appropriate for the situation, or just not being themselves. Not being themselves is the biggest turnoff for most people, I think.

2007-06-12 09:20:48 · answer #3 · answered by judyarb1945 5 · 0 0

If it is about 'experience' of true love within, then being loveless is not just an emotional disability, but a disability in being a 'human' itself ! Whichever way we look at it, when ever we feel love about something we experience that as alteast little of it as a part of ourself, and if there is no such thing as love at all, then where is the 'human' in that being ?
Well, this is about true love, love as an inner experience, and not the mutual benefit scheme (give and take business).

2007-06-12 09:20:09 · answer #4 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0 0

it depens on your state of mind if you have been hurt before than no it means you have built a wall to protect your heart eventually you will find that special someone that will make u happy then u will b ok but if you have never have loved at all and you have this wall up yes you have problems find happiness with in yourself first then you will find love

2007-06-12 18:35:06 · answer #5 · answered by james m 1 · 0 0

No its not my dear, the battle is not won by the strongest but by he that believes he can win, never can tell he might be saving the best for the last.

2007-06-12 10:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by Bobo 3 · 0 0

One can not loose love if he is ready to give love.But if you start love everybody then your defeat is unavoidable.

2007-06-12 11:22:38 · answer #7 · answered by kandaswamyraveendhranperumal 4 · 0 0

of course not.
in order to love someone, you must love yourself first. that's probably one factor you might want to look in to. try to spend time with yourself and discover yourself more to love yourself more, before spending time loving others.

2007-06-12 09:23:00 · answer #8 · answered by Deirdre 2 · 0 0

yes i agree with u.and i also like ur avtar,the brown cat.

2007-06-12 09:23:53 · answer #9 · answered by toploser 5 · 0 0

It can be...yes.

2007-06-12 13:13:09 · answer #10 · answered by Cami 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers