I remember. I saw the wtc I was there and I also volunteered at ground zero and it is so surreal all the stuff that really happened. I guess thats why most people cant believe it. To much information for their brains to comprehend such travesties. I am not one of those crazy conspiracy theorists. I look at the facts check this out coming from Rumsfeld himself and other truths. Watch them slip up. No plane at pentagon.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NFVSwRTJIhM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=I-eqI9OgW44
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs
2007-06-11
19:45:47
·
9 answers
·
asked by
karayzeebutieful
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Answer me this why did it come from Rumsfelds mouth. Why were there no outraged families for the supposed flight 77 coming forward no funerals no memorial. As for flight 93 being shot down. when in your life have you ever seen a plane wreck and there be no wreckage just be tiny pieces left. Usually you see a part of the engine tail wing. I dont want to believe it but I cant ignore those facts and proof. Another thing like i said I was there. there were other buildings surrounding the towers and they were damaged chunks blown out on fire,but they did not fall like that they were older and remained standing. I saw this with my own eyes. Am i not to believe what I saw.
2007-06-11
20:04:20 ·
update #1
why did wtc # 7 building collapse . it wasnt hit by a plane
2007-06-11
20:59:10 ·
update #2
You have a promising career writing science fiction.
2007-06-11 19:51:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conspiracy theories are great and all, but realize who you are talking about here. Are you implying that the Bush Administration is involved in a vast 9/11 plot and cover-up? You have to look at your suspects and ask, "could these guys ever do something like this?" It might seem like a possiblity, but the simple truth is that Bush could never pull this off. This administration has basically moved from one scandal to the next, each exposing vast new levels of incompetence. They couldn't even fire U.S. Attorneys (a perfectly legal action) without it ending in the resignation of the Attorney General and most of his staff. Rumsfeld has never gotten any facts straight in any of his speeches, so to assume that he made a slip and revealed some sinister plot inadvertently is hard to believe. If you have learned anything from the Bush presidency, it should be that in no way could such an incompetent and under qualified group of people actually carry out something so huge without any problems or repercussions. Think of all the leaks that come out of the White House everyday, no way would a 9/11 cover up make it through the political system without being exposed. The bitter pill to swallow is that our government had their heads up their asses and that they couldn't imagine something like this happening (although Pentagon officials planned for it a few years earlier and Ramsey Bin al-Sheib talked about using airliners as weapons years before as well). 9/11 is another item on Bush's list of failures as Commander in Chief, the only difference with this one is that Bush thinks of 9/11 as a victory, at least a political victory for the Republican party.
2016-05-17 23:47:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Goodness sake, dear, the engine of the plane was recovered having punched through three underground stories of the place! The plane wasn't meant to survive direct impact with a steel reinforced concrete structure! It's like you keep expecting there to be a Wiley Coyote shaped hole where the plane went through!
You ignore the engineering reports, the official reports, for this? What nonsense. Some of us have seen both. Some of us do our research instead of letting youtube do our thinking for us.
Goodness sake, they claim it's a plane that was shot down, then follow it with the claim that it's a missile. How about the one showing Satan's face in the smoke?
So our administration could get two planes for New York, but couldn't find one for the Pentagon and had to resort to a missile?
And if they did shoot it down and thus it's impact on the Pentagon was less, you get upset about that? Whose side are you on? Sorry, it's fairly obvious.
Your efforts undermine our country at a time of war. My family fled Islam in the 1950s. We've been expecting this war for decades. We didn't expect so many people to make excuses for us or act so insanely in the middle of Islamic terrorists gleefully taking full credit for the attacks, even when being hunted to extinction, and thousands cheering in the streets in the Middle East, laughing at our pain and suffering.
2007-06-11 19:54:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Flight 93 crashed at full throttle heading almost straight down. At that speed, everything blows apart leaving the aforementioned tiny pieces. Also, if flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, where did they go? They took off from the airport. Plenty of witnesses confirm that. There aren't too many places you can secretly land a commercial jet without someone seeing or hearing something.
2007-06-12 02:11:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was on flight 93 and as we landed safely in Kansas we were told to act like we were dead and never to tell anyone we actually weren't dead. It was explained that this was part of the president's plan to declare war on Iraq and take over the world. It was such a good plan that even the democrats went along with it. Seriously now, has it ever occurred to you how impossible it would be to cover up a conspiracy of this magnitude?
2007-06-12 05:13:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
the thing that bothered me is in the Pentagon when the "jet" hit, it only left a like a 15 foot hole. but if the wings hit, there was no other damage done right next to that hole. and how can in all these attacks there was almost no evidence of any plane around?
2007-06-12 12:07:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The thing about these conspiracy theories is that there are so many of them. That sort of detracts from the believablity for me because only one could be true, not all of them. Why is it so hard to believe that someone besides our own government could actually inflict some damage on us.
2007-06-11 19:53:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by seth817 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I suggest you read the popular Mechanics story about the Myths of 9-11. you have swallowed nearly every conspiricy theory around and are in sore need of the truth.
2007-06-15 13:33:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, concerning your avatar name, at least we know the "karayzee" part of your name is right. Wow, you must be a real sight if you are as "butieful" as you are "karayzee".
2007-06-11 19:57:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by bkc99xx 6
·
1⤊
0⤋