a less fortunate, faithful spouse who loves you?
It all comes down to financial or emotional security. Which would you prefer?
2007-06-11 15:23:48 · 29 answers · asked by StarPower 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I have to go with love and faithfulness. I can't believe I am saying that, but I would. Besides, the less fortunate person could always become wealthy in the long run. Then it would be a great situation filled with love and security.
2007-06-11 15:33:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Emotional security. A faithful spouse. Visit http://www.howtodealwithabreakup.com
2007-06-11 15:27:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
There are plenty more alternatives than what you are offering. While it is romantic to say love first, many married people will tell you that when you can't pay your bills and have no shelters and foods for your kids, you become parenoid and emotional and start blaming others.
I know of many elderly couples who have little and gone through a lot. I think a modern day girl will be hard pressed to want to live through 50-60 years of living hands to mouth with bare minimum and still feel fortunately loved. Remember, no cell phones, no cars, no jewelry, no travel, etc., just the guy next to you 24x7.
2007-06-11 15:43:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sir Richard 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Less fortunate, faithful spouse.
Just think of when you get old and all the money you have or had doesn't mean a damn thing because you can hardly walk, nevermind get out the door to spend it.
I would rather be able to sit in my chair and cuddle next to that little old man that will show me love and affection. All we can take with us at the last moments are those good memories shared with those that we love.
2007-06-11 15:32:06 · answer #4 · answered by lovely 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Love, fidelity, and emotional security are about a bazillion times more important than the money. I'm assuming that this does not mean being homeless, though, because that would be out of the question, no matter what my preferences!
2007-06-11 15:27:25 · answer #5 · answered by Kestra SpiritNova 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the less fortunate, faithful, loving one
emotional security outweighs the financial BY FAR!
2007-06-11 15:34:41 · answer #6 · answered by uranus2mars 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hmmmmmmmmmmm be well off and have a cheating wife or be broke and have a faithful wife.......Hmmm could it then be considered a marriage of conveinience? I go with the cheating wife. I would be unhappy with her but I could find other things to occupy my time..... being that this "IS" a marriage of convenience....................It beats being in love and poor living in a crappy home with a crappy car and crappy clothes and eating crappy macaroni and cheese.Cause chances are living like that will only depress the 2 of you eventually. Give me steak and lobster a lexus a 3000sq ft fully furnished home, the luxuries of a modern day home and a marriage of convenience to go along with it.
And to those of you that say that money can not buy happiness are probably the ones who have never had money...... I have money , I am secure with myself and have lots of happiness.It boils down to survival and how comfortable you want to be whilst surviving. In the words of Marie Antionette"Let Them Eat Cake"...............
2007-06-11 15:31:42 · answer #7 · answered by scott b 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the wealthy cheating spouse paid me a million dollars for his affair, hmmmm, I'd take it, then find a faithful spouse.
2007-06-11 15:29:09 · answer #8 · answered by Sondra 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Less fortunate, faithful spouse who loves me. Cheating would make me a prison inmate.
2007-06-11 15:27:52 · answer #9 · answered by Sleek 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Definitely emotional security. Money can't buy happiness.
2007-06-11 15:51:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋