They've been saying Iraq was a mistake but how many have actually claimed partial responsibility without saying, "Bush told us lies" blah blah blah. If Bush is as big of a fool as they say then they should be really ashamed they were tricked by a fool. How many truly honorable democrats are in Congress and openly admit their mistake without passing off the blame on someone else?
2007-06-11 13:12:50 · 14 answers · asked by NONAME 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not many. Just check the Congressional Record and look at who voted and how, then compare it with what they are saying now.
2007-06-11 13:18:03 · answer #1 · answered by nomad74 3 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Democrats and Republicans alike voted for the use of force based on lies given to them from the Bush administration. Now that they know the truth, they don't feel the war is a just war. It wasn't just your "fool Bush" as you call him, it was many from his administration and intelligence community. What's wrong with admitting a mistake and trying to correct it? That's something your type knows nothing about I suppose!
2007-06-18 13:52:19 · answer #2 · answered by little timmie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you were paying attention to the votes in Congress and in the Senate-the majority of the Democrats voted to get us out of Iraq. Bush keeps saying we need to be there. There has been an increasing number of Republicans who are saying get out too.
2007-06-19 11:05:49 · answer #3 · answered by phlada64 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely right. They should have never trusted this fool full of deception. The lies he told of eminent doom and destruction.
Next time the fourth estate (the press) save for FOX. Will question very strongly the motives of a war mongering president. Without fear of being called "Unpatriotic"
And Dem's will not be afraid of being called "weak" on defence.
NOW! when will BUSH own up to his mistake, that he has totally miscalculated his success on every step and prediction made in the take over and hand over of an oil rich country?
2007-06-18 14:27:17 · answer #4 · answered by jy9900 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No Democrats or Republicans voted for military force in Iraq.They voted to abdicate their constitutional responsibility to either declare or not declare war.The resolution was to give authorization for the use of force.There are nuances in life,you know.
2007-06-17 18:40:18 · answer #5 · answered by R B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a congressman, but I can pretty darn confidently say I was against from the start oh so long ago. If I was for it at the beginning, i'm prettyconfident my ego could handle admitting that I was wrong. It's an ego problem for all the rest that won't admit it.
2007-06-11 13:21:36 · answer #6 · answered by krs14 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You make an astute observation.
Historically you will find Democrats to be blood-brothers with Machiavelli. They flap in the breeze of public opinion because they possess no core beliefs, beyond their love of the Socialist ideal and the need for continued employment at the public teet.
2007-06-17 11:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by aviator147 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
sure, because of practise that they have been given they gave Bush the authority to apply rigidity IF mandatory. Congress in no way declared conflict. If I have been in Congress at that factor, i might have voted NO.
2016-10-09 00:35:53 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You will never get the truth out of a Democrat Politician, they won't ever admit that they were for the war in Iraq.
2007-06-11 13:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
None have ....the foolish Dems have decided to try to cast a no confidence vote against Gonzales instead. THey failed.
He, he..ha, ha lol...what fools. I decided to vote no confidence in the Democrat"s stupidity.
2007-06-11 13:20:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋