European Countries like France, Belgium and Germany are turning away from the left of center socialist governments, here at home at least four of the Democrat candidate for President are preaching things that would make Karl Marx and Nikita Krushchev proud.
While in Manchester New Hampshire over the weekend Senator Clinton said, " free enterprise capitalism is the root of all evil"!
I guess she thinks our system is worse than Nazism, Communism and all other forms of population control.
She went on to say " we will replace an "on your Own" society with one of shared responsibility and prosperity."
When Nikita was Premier of the Communist party he gave a speech in a closed door session of the Politburo during which he spoke of the evils of Stalin, and what must be done to rectify those acts.
Hilliary's speech sounded strangely familiar.
Krushchev said this: "We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all; we must… return to and actually practice in all our ideological work the most important theses of Marxist-Leninist science about the people as the creator of history and as the creator of all material and spiritual good of humanity... [We must] continue systematically and consistently the work done by the Party's Central Committee (substitute Hilliary's government) during the last years, a work characterized by minute observation in all Party organizations, from the bottom to the top, of the Leninist principles of Party leadership... characterized by the wide practice of criticism and self-criticism. [We must] to restore completely the Leninist principles of Soviet socialist democracy, expressed in the Constitution of the Soviet Union, to fight willfulness of individuals abusing their power. The evil caused by acts violating revolutionary socialist legality which have accumulated during a long time as a result of the negative influence of the cult of the individual has to be completely corrected."
As was said previously: "one step at a time" and they will turn this free country into a Socialist anti- personal freedom, anti-God loving country into a secularist "Village"!
2007-06-11 13:10:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by bwlobo 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
absolutely everyone who calls Hillary Clinton a "socialist" or "communist" is the two thoroughly unaware of the meaning of those words, or a liar, or the two. In different words, a Republican. I each from time to time ask your self approximately rightwingers who're so far off the deep end that all people, alongside with moderates and different rightwingers look "socialist" with the aid of assessment.
2016-11-10 03:53:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Noone can make the case because she has socialist ideals. To the ones above who claim she isn't because of this or that reason, one doesn't have to accept every socialist policy to be socialist.
2007-06-11 13:59:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Truth7 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
socialism |ˈsō sh əˌlizəm| noun a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. • policy or practice based on this theory. • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.
Ahh, nope! Can't be done.
2007-06-11 13:59:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Moneta_Lucina 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a silly question. Even the official "Socialist Party" platform states that they realize they will not transform our capitalistic system to a socialist one. Hillary obviously isn't a member of the socialist party.
"Although reforms will not in themselves bring about socialism, the fight for them will advance the cause by demonstrating the inherent limitations and injustice of the capitalist system." (taken from the socialist party platform).
http://sp-usa.org/platform/
2007-06-11 13:15:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gemini 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
why don't you come up with reasons why you think she is? She's for labor unions and a general health care system for everyone...that's socialism....but she's not Communist or does she want the nationalize any companies...she is actually very pro-Capitalist....Questions like this try to make everything black and white, when the reality is shades of gray....I would agree that she is more of a socialist that GW Bush but less a socialist than any in France's Socialist Party...
Or is it...everyone that agrees with you is on this side and everyone else is a socialist?
I guess having a few socialistic tendencies make a person evil beyond measure
2007-06-11 13:05:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
What are you babbling about.
Ok, here you go: Bill Clinton was much more of a fiscal conservative that GWB. Hello? Sorry to confuse you the facts.
Guess you are totally fine with the trillion dollar debt to China.
Incidental quote: "(Clinton Treasury Secretary) Reich was the best friend Wall Street ever had"-Jim Cramer
Psychotic Harridan alert (look out belooowwww!!) Gotta love these conservatives Moonbats!
2007-06-11 13:05:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by celticexpress 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/
Go find what you think is socialist and post it. Otherwise, stop annoying everyone.
2007-06-11 13:56:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Nope, cant be done. She is a socialist.
2007-06-11 13:01:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by hedddon 5
·
7⤊
4⤋
Yes.
Senator Clinton has never called for centralized production, or distribution, of market goods.
Next question?
2007-06-11 13:03:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by like a BOSS 6
·
5⤊
7⤋